2015-06-16 01:15, Zhang, Helin:
> Yes, your patches are OK for me. I have acked it.
Series applied, thanks
Hi Jay
From: Jay Rolette [mailto:role...@infiniteio.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:43 PM
To: Zhang, Helin
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: minor opto
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Zhang, Helin mailto:helin.zhang at intel.com>> wrote:
Would it be
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 3:08 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: minor opto
>
> Don't need the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry() i
rovement doesn't really matter.
>
> - Helin
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
> > Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 3:19 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3
Would it be better to modify the similar thing in kni_ioctl_create()?
- Helin
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette
> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2015 3:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3]
2015-06-04 14:40, Bruce Richardson:
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 02:39:17PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:18:55PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote:
> > > Don't need the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry() if you aren't
> > > deleting from the list as you iterate over it
>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 05:02:06PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-06-04 14:40, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 02:39:17PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:18:55PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote:
> > > > Don't need the 'safe' version of
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 02:39:17PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:18:55PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote:
> > Don't need the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry() if you aren't
> > deleting from the list as you iterate over it
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jay Rolette
>
>
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 02:18:55PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote:
> Don't need the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry() if you aren't deleting
> from the list as you iterate over it
>
> Signed-off-by: Jay Rolette
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson
Don't need the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry() if you aren't deleting
from the list as you iterate over it
Signed-off-by: Jay Rolette
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
Don't need the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry() if you aren't deleting
from the list as you iterate over it
Signed-off-by: Jay Rolette
---
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_misc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
11 matches
Mail list logo
