Hi Yuanhan,
I appreciate your checking.
I haven't noticed SET_BACKEND is only supported by vhost-cuse. :-(
I will follow your comments, then submit again.
Thanks,
Tetsuya
On 2015/10/27 15:47, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:12:53PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> The patch fixes
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:28:58PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
>
> I appreciate your checking.
Welcome! And thank you for catching out my faults.
--yliu
> I haven't noticed SET_BACKEND is only supported by vhost-cuse. :-(
> I will follow your comments, then submit again.
The patch fixes wrong handling of virtqueue array index.
GET_VRING_BASE:
The vhost backend will receive the message per virtqueue.
Also we should call a destroy callback when both RXQ and TXQ receives
the message.
SET_BACKEND:
Because vhost library supports multiple queue, the index may be over
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:12:53PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> The patch fixes wrong handling of virtqueue array index.
>
> GET_VRING_BASE:
> The vhost backend will receive the message per virtqueue.
> Also we should call a destroy callback when both RXQ and TXQ receives
> the message.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:29:25PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:12:53PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> > The patch fixes wrong handling of virtqueue array index.
> >
> > GET_VRING_BASE:
> > The vhost backend will receive the message per virtqueue.
>
> No, that's not
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:12:53PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> The patch fixes wrong handling of virtqueue array index.
>
> GET_VRING_BASE:
> The vhost backend will receive the message per virtqueue.
No, that's not right, we will get GET_VRING_BASE for each queue pair,
including RX and TX
6 matches
Mail list logo
