> > /proc/version_signature is the version for the host machine, but in e.g.,
> > chroots,
> > this does not necessarily match that DPDK is built for. DPDK will then
> > build for the
> > wrong kernel version - that of the server, and not that installed in the
> > (build)
> > chroot.
> >
> >
On 2015-11-04 19:21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:29:01 +0100
> Simon K?gstr?m wrote:
>
>> On 2015-11-04 11:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 2015-08-20 08:51, Simon Kagstrom:
-ifeq ($(shell test -f /proc/version_signature && lsb_release -si
2>/dev/null),Ubuntu)
On 2015-11-04 11:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-08-20 08:51, Simon Kagstrom:
>> -ifeq ($(shell test -f /proc/version_signature && lsb_release -si
>> 2>/dev/null),Ubuntu)
>> +ifeq ($(shell lsb_release -si 2>/dev/null),Ubuntu)
>> MODULE_CFLAGS += -DUBUNTU_RELEASE_CODE=$(shell lsb_release -sr |
2015-08-20 08:51, Simon Kagstrom:
> /proc/version_signature is the version for the host machine, but in
> e.g., chroots, this does not necessarily match that DPDK is built
> for. DPDK will then build for the wrong kernel version - that of the
> server, and not that installed in the (build) chroot.
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:29:01 +0100
Simon K?gstr?m wrote:
> On 2015-11-04 11:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-08-20 08:51, Simon Kagstrom:
> >> -ifeq ($(shell test -f /proc/version_signature && lsb_release -si
> >> 2>/dev/null),Ubuntu)
> >> +ifeq ($(shell lsb_release -si 2>/dev/null),Ubuntu)
>
Ping?
(Also including Stephen, Patrice and Pawel which has had comments on an
earlier iteration of this patch).
// Simon
On 2015-08-20 08:51, Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> /proc/version_signature is the version for the host machine, but in
> e.g., chroots, this does not necessarily match that DPDK is
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Kagstrom [mailto:simon.kagstrom at netinsight.net]
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 2:51 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin; thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] kni: Use utsrelease.h to determine Ubuntu kernel version
>
>
Hi Simon,
I'm looking forward to this patch since we also build the DPDK for
kernel versions which differ from the host kernel.
IMHO, the check for "Ubuntu" also needs change since this is also a
"host system" check instead of "target system" check.
I.e. A user may want to build for Ubuntu on a
Ping?
// Simon
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 08:51:06 +0200
Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> /proc/version_signature is the version for the host machine, but in
> e.g., chroots, this does not necessarily match that DPDK is built
> for. DPDK will then build for the wrong kernel version - that of the
> server, and
/proc/version_signature is the version for the host machine, but in
e.g., chroots, this does not necessarily match that DPDK is built
for. DPDK will then build for the wrong kernel version - that of the
server, and not that installed in the (build) chroot.
The patch uses utsrelease.h from the
10 matches
Mail list logo
