t;
>
>
> *From:* Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedkinv at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:19 AM
> *To:* Wu, Jingjing
> *Cc:* Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic
> filter
>
>
>
.
Thank you!
Jingjing
From: Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:19 AM
To: Wu, Jingjing
Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic filter
Hi Jingjing,
Yes, I agree.
I have one more remark
your agree my proposal?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedkinv at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 13, 2014 7:52 PM
> *To:* Thomas Monjalon
> *Cc:* Wu, Jingjing; dev at dpdk.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for ge
Hi all,
The 82599 datasheet (p. 284 and p.287) has only recommendations and only
when possible about assign rx queue not used by RSS/DCB. I do not see any
serious restrictions do not assign the rx queue used by RSS/DCB.
For cases with only 1 queue if I understand correctly this patch
it and integrate the change to patch in
new version.
Do your agree my proposal?
From: Vladimir Medvedkin [mailto:medvedk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 7:52 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon
Cc: Wu, Jingjing; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support
> 2014-06-11 17:45, Thomas Monjalon:
> > My main concern is that Vladimir Medvedkin suggested another API and I'd
> > like you give your opinion about it:
> > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-June/003053.html
> > It offers pool number in configuration of the filters.
2014-06-12
To: Wu, Jingjing
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Vladimir Medvedkin
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic filter
Hi Jingjing,
Please reply below the question.
2014-05-28 01:12, Wu, Jingjing:
> You are discussing whether the APIs provide for NIC filters is generic
> or not.
Hi Jingjing,
Please reply below the question.
2014-05-28 01:12, Wu, Jingjing:
> You are discussing whether the APIs provide for NIC filters is generic
> or not. About that we can use same API for a type of filter. For example,
> if we want to configure ethertype filter, we can use the same API,
Tested-by: Waterman Cao
This patch includes 4 files, and has been tested by Intel.
Please see information as the following:
Fedora 20 x86_64, Linux Kernel 3.11.10-301, GCC 4.8.2
Intel Xeon CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
NIC: Intel Niantic 82599, Intel i350, Intel 82580 and Intel 82576
We verified
Hi Jingjing,
2014-05-24 09:37, Jingjing Wu:
> A generic filter mechanism for handling special packet is required.
> It will allow filters to be set in HW when available so that specific
> packet may be filtered by NICs to specific descriptor queues for
> processing. Currently only Flow Director
esday, May 28, 2014 7:22 AM
To: Wu, Jingjing
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic filter
Hi Jingjing,
2014-05-24 09:37, Jingjing Wu:
> A generic filter mechanism for handling special packet is required.
> It will allow filters to b
ng
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] NIC filters support for generic filter
Hi Jingjing,
2014-05-24 09:37, Jingjing Wu:
> A generic filter mechanism for handling special packet is required.
> It will allow filters to be set in HW when available so that specif
--- the v2 patchset changes:
--- add NIC filter support for 82576
--- rework for code rule warning if using git apply to apply patch
A generic filter mechanism for handling special packet is required.
It will allow filters to be set in HW when available so that specific
packet may be filtered by
13 matches
Mail list logo
