[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] mempool: Add sanity check when secondary link in less mempools than primary

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:11:12PM +0100, Olivier Matz wrote: > Hi Jean, > > > Do you mind if we put back this conversation on the ML? Oh, I forgot to do it ? I intended to. Bummer. Please do so. > I think your example shows that there is no linker magic: you just > need the same

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] mempool: Add sanity check when secondary link in less mempools than primary

Hello Jean, On 10/28/2016 08:37 PM, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > If the mempool ops the caller wants to use is not registered, the > library will segfault in an obscure way when trying to use that > mempool. It's better to catch it early and warn the user. > > If the primary and secondary process

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] mempool: Add sanity check when secondary link in less mempools than primary

If the mempool ops the caller wants to use is not registered, the library will segfault in an obscure way when trying to use that mempool. It's better to catch it early and warn the user. If the primary and secondary process were build using different build systems, the list of constructors