On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Jan Viktorin
wrote:
> What about the RTE_VERIFY? I think, it's more appropriate here.
Well, here, I am removing useless checks in static functions.
But for the rest of ethdev api, I agree we could add some RTE_VERIFY.
> Otherwise, feel free to add:
>
>
What about the RTE_VERIFY? I think, it's more appropriate here.
Otherwise, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Viktorin
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:06:57 +0100
David Marchand wrote:
> We are in static functions and those passed arguments can't be NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Marchand
> ---
>
We are in static functions and those passed arguments can't be NULL.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 15 ---
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
index ed971b4..cab74e0 100644
3 matches
Mail list logo