Suspect this will introduce an extra indirection and call/return into
the generated code, but can't think of any alternative that doesn't
potentially break source compatibility..
On 16/02/2016 07:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> When built in a C++ application, the keepalive include fails:
>
>
When built in a C++ application, the keepalive include fails:
rte_keepalive.h:142:41: error: ?ALIVE? was not declared in this scope
keepcfg->state_flags[rte_lcore_id()] = ALIVE;
^
C++ requires to use a scope operator to access an enum inside a struct.
2 matches
Mail list logo
