2015-11-17 22:33, Wang, Liang-min:
> Thomas,
> Could you explain why this patch is put on RFC?
Hi,
It is not RFC but Changes Requested.
It means a new version is expected to adress comments.
mas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 12:36 PM
> > To: Wang, Liang-min
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples: new example: l2fwd-
> > ethtool
> >
> > 2015-07-23 11:00, Liang-Min
2015-07-23 11:00, Liang-Min Larry Wang:
> examples/Makefile|1 +
> examples/l2fwd-ethtool/Makefile | 48 +
> examples/l2fwd-ethtool/l2fwd-app/Makefile| 58 ++
> examples/l2fwd-ethtool/l2fwd-app/main.c | 1025
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] examples: new example: l2fwd-
> ethtool
>
> 2015-07-23 11:00, Liang-Min Larry Wang:
> > examples/Makefile|1 +
> > examples/l2fwd-ethtool/Makefile | 48 +
> >
The example includes an ethtool library and two applications:
one application is a non- DPDK process (nic-control)
and the other is a DPDK l2fwd applicaiton (l2fwd-app).
The nic-control process sends ethtool alike device management
requests to l2fwd-app through a named pipe IPC. This example
is
5 matches
Mail list logo
