2014-12-09 02:14, Zhang, Helin:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2014-12-06 09:33, Helin Zhang:
> > > Before redefining mbuf structure, there was lack of free bits in
> > > 'ol_flags'
> > > (32 bits in total) for new RX or TX flags. So it tried to reuse
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 6:45 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; olivier.matz at 6wind.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix of enabling all newly added RX error flags
>
> Hi Helin,
>
> >
Hi Thomas
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 6:51 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix of enabling all newly added RX
> erro
Hi Helin,
2014-12-06 09:33, Helin Zhang:
> Before redefining mbuf structure, there was lack of free bits in 'ol_flags'
> (32 bits in total) for new RX or TX flags. So it tried to reuse existant
> bits as most as possible, or even assigning 0 to some of bit flags. After
> new mbuf structure
Hi Helin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Helin
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 1:34 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Cao, Waterman; Cao, Min; olivier.matz at 6wind.com; Ananyev, Konstantin;
> Zhang, Helin
> Subject: [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix of enabling all newly added RX error flags
>
Before redefining mbuf structure, there was lack of free bits in 'ol_flags'
(32 bits in total) for new RX or TX flags. So it tried to reuse existant
bits as most as possible, or even assigning 0 to some of bit flags. After
new mbuf structure defined, there are quite a lot of free bits. So those
6 matches
Mail list logo
