On 2016/06/06 19:50, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Please let me make sure how we can invoke many DPDK applications in
>> hundreds containers.
>> (Do we have a way to do? Or, will we have it in the future?)
>
> Just to add some option here, we cannot say no to that kind of use case.
> To have many
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:12:28PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/06/06 19:50, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> >> Please let me make sure how we can invoke many DPDK applications in
> >> hundreds containers.
> >> (Do we have a way to do? Or, will we have it in the future?)
> >
> > Just to add some
Hi,
On 6/6/2016 5:30 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/06/06 17:49, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:33:31PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> [My solution]
> - Pros
> Basic principle of my implementation is not to reinvent the wheel.
Yes, that's a good point.
Hi,
On 6/6/2016 5:28 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/06/06 17:03, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 6/6/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>>
>>> Sorry for late replying.
>>>
>>> On 2016/06/03 13:17, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900,
On 2016/06/06 17:49, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:33:31PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
[My solution]
- Pros
Basic principle of my implementation is not to reinvent the wheel.
>>>
>>> Yes, that's a good point. However, it's not that hard as we would have
>>>
On 2016/06/06 17:03, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 6/6/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>
>> Sorry for late replying.
>>
>> On 2016/06/03 13:17, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
Hi Yuanhan,
On
On 2016/06/06 16:21, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:10:46PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>
>> Sorry for late replying.
>
> Never mind.
>
>>
>> On 2016/06/03 13:17, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:33:31PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> >> [My solution]
> >> - Pros
> >> Basic principle of my implementation is not to reinvent the wheel.
> >
> > Yes, that's a good point. However, it's not that hard as we would have
> > thought in the first time: the tough part that
Hi,
On 6/6/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
>
> Sorry for late replying.
>
> On 2016/06/03 13:17, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>>
>>> On 2016/06/02 16:31, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
But still, I'd ask do we
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:10:46PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
>
> Sorry for late replying.
Never mind.
>
> On 2016/06/03 13:17, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> >> Hi Yuanhan,
> >>
> >> On 2016/06/02 16:31, Yuanhan Liu
Hi Yuanhan,
Sorry for late replying.
On 2016/06/03 13:17, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> Hi Yuanhan,
>>
>> On 2016/06/02 16:31, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>>> But still, I'd ask do we really need 2 virtio for container solutions?
>>
>> I
2016-06-03 12:17, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> > Hi Yuanhan,
> >
> > On 2016/06/02 16:31, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > But still, I'd ask do we really need 2 virtio for container solutions?
> >
> > I appreciate your comments.
>
> No, I appreciate
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
>
> On 2016/06/02 16:31, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > But still, I'd ask do we really need 2 virtio for container solutions?
>
> I appreciate your comments.
No, I appreciate your effort for contributing to DPDK! vhost-pmd
Hi Yuanhan,
On 2016/06/02 16:31, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> But still, I'd ask do we really need 2 virtio for container solutions?
I appreciate your comments.
Let me have time to discuss it with our team.
Thanks,
Tetsuya
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:29:39PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> The patches will work on below patch series.
> - [PATCH v5 0/8] virtio support for container
>
> It seems his implementation will be changed a bit.
> So, this patch series are also going to be changed to follow his
>
The patches will work on below patch series.
- [PATCH v5 0/8] virtio support for container
It seems his implementation will be changed a bit.
So, this patch series are also going to be changed to follow his implementation.
[Changes]
v5 changes:
- Rebase on latest dpdk-next-virtio.
- Follow
16 matches
Mail list logo
