> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 6:56 AM
> To: Olivier MATZ; Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Liu, Jijiang
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_flags and repalce
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 6:20 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin; Olivier MATZ; Liu, Jijiang; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_flags and repalce
> PKT_TX_VXLAN_C
Hi,
On 12/04/2014 12:03 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> 1/ (Jijiang's patch)
> PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM /* packet is IPv4, and we want hw cksum */
> PKT_TX_IPV6 /* packet is IPv6 */
> PKT_TX_IPV4 /* packet is IPv4, and we don't want hw cksum */
>
> with PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM
Hi,
On 12/04/2014 11:19 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>> 1/ (Jijiang's patch)
>>> PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM /* packet is IPv4, and we want hw cksum */
>>> PKT_TX_IPV6 /* packet is IPv6 */
>>> PKT_TX_IPV4 /* packet is IPv4, and we don't want hw cksum */
>>>
>>> with PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM and
Hi,
2014-12-04 10:23, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> From: Liu, Jijiang
> > From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> > > On 12/03/2014 01:59 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > >> I still think having a flag IPV4 + another flag IP_CHECKSUM is not
> > > >> appropriate.
> > > >
> > > >
Hi Helin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Helin
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 6:52 AM
> To: Olivier MATZ; Ananyev, Konstantin; Liu, Jijiang; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_flags and repalce
>
Hi Helin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhang, Helin
> Sent: Thursday, December 4, 2014 2:52 PM
> To: Olivier MATZ; Ananyev, Konstantin; Liu, Jijiang; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_flags and repalce
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 10:42 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Liu, Jijiang; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_fl
Hi Olivier,
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 10:42 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin; Liu, Jijiang; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_fl
Hi Konstantin,
On 12/03/2014 01:59 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>> I still think having a flag IPV4 + another flag IP_CHECKSUM is not
>> appropriate.
>
> Sorry, didn't get you here.
> Are you talking about our discussion should PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM and PKT_TX_IPV4
> be mutually exclusive or not?
Hi Oliver,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 11:41 AM
> To: Liu, Jijiang; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] mbuf:add three TX ol_flags and repalce
>
Replace PKT_TX_VXLAN_CKSUM with PKT_TX_UDP_TUNNEL_PKT in order to indicate a
packet is an UDP tunneling packet, and introduce 3 TX offload flags for outer
IP TX checksum, which are PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM, PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 and
PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6 respectively;Rework csum forward engine and i40e
12 matches
Mail list logo
