n at tuxdriver.com
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type in
>> rte_mbuf
>>
>> On 06/12/2015 10:43 AM, Zhang, Helin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From:
n at tuxdriver.com
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type in
>> rte_mbuf
>>
>> On 06/10/2015 07:14 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 2015-06-10 16:32, Olivier MATZ:
>>>> On 06/02/2015 03:27 PM, O
On 06/10/2015 07:14 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-06-10 16:32, Olivier MATZ:
>> On 06/02/2015 03:27 PM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
On 06/01/2015 09:33 AM, Helin Zhang wrote:
> In order to unify the packet type, the fi
, Tim;
> > nhorman at tuxdriver.com
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type in
> > rte_mbuf
> >
> > On 06/12/2015 10:43 AM, Zhang, Helin wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -Original M
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Olivier MATZ; O'Driscoll, Tim; Zhang, Helin;
> >> nhorman at tuxdriver.com
> >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type
> >> in rte_mbuf
> >>
> >> On 06/10/2015
> -Original Message-
> From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmatilai at redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:24 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Olivier MATZ; O'Driscoll, Tim; Zhang, Helin;
> nhorman at tuxdriver.com
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:40 PM
> To: Olivier MATZ; O'Driscoll, Tim; Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type in
> rte_mbuf
>
> Hi Olivier,
2015-06-10 16:32, Olivier MATZ:
> On 06/02/2015 03:27 PM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> >> On 06/01/2015 09:33 AM, Helin Zhang wrote:
> >>> In order to unify the packet type, the field of 'packet_type' in
> >>> 'struct rte_mbuf' ne
Hi Tim, Helin,
On 06/02/2015 03:27 PM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
>> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 9:15 AM
>> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject
Hi Olivier,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 3:33 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet
Hi Oliver
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 10:33 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine pa
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2015 9:15 AM
> To: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/18] mbuf: redefine packet_type in
> rte_mbuf
>
> Hi Helin,
In order to unify the packet type, the field of 'packet_type' in
'struct rte_mbuf' needs to be extended from 16 to 32 bits.
Accordingly, some fields in 'struct rte_mbuf' are re-organized to
support this change for Vector PMD. As 'struct rte_kni_mbuf' for
KNI should be right mapped to 'struct rte_mb
Hi Helin,
+CC Neil
On 06/01/2015 09:33 AM, Helin Zhang wrote:
> In order to unify the packet type, the field of 'packet_type' in
> 'struct rte_mbuf' needs to be extended from 16 to 32 bits.
> Accordingly, some fields in 'struct rte_mbuf' are re-organized to
> support this change for Vector PMD. A
14 matches
Mail list logo