[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops

2016-06-03 Thread Olivier Matz
On 06/03/2016 04:06 PM, Hunt, David wrote: > > > On 6/3/2016 1:28 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote: >>> [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops >> Should the title be fixed? >> I don't feel this allows application to change the default ops. > > Allow _user_ to change default

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops

2016-06-03 Thread Hunt, David
On 6/3/2016 3:10 PM, Olivier Matz wrote: > > On 06/03/2016 04:06 PM, Hunt, David wrote: >> >> On 6/3/2016 1:28 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote: [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops >>> Should the title be fixed? >>> I don't feel this allows application to change the default

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops

2016-06-03 Thread Hunt, David
On 6/3/2016 1:28 PM, Olivier MATZ wrote: >> [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops > Should the title be fixed? > I don't feel this allows application to change the default ops. Allow _user_ to change default mempool ops, I think.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops

2016-06-03 Thread Olivier MATZ
> [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops Should the title be fixed? I don't feel this allows application to change the default ops.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/5] mbuf: allow apps to change default mempool ops

2016-06-02 Thread David Hunt
By default, the mempool ops used for mbuf allocations is a multi producer and multi consumer ring. We could imagine a target (maybe some network processors?) that provides an hardware-assisted pool mechanism. In this case, the default configuration for this architecture would contain a different