Hi Stephen,
On 5/29/2015 11:27 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2015 16:45:25 +0800
> Cunming Liang wrote:
>
>> +#ifdef RTE_EAL_RX_INTR
>> +extern int
>> rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_ctl(uint8_t port_id, int epfd, int op, void *data);
>> +#else
>> +static inline int
>>
Never mind, had wrong version of one of the patches.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Stephen Hemminger
wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2015 16:45:25 +0800
> Cunming Liang wrote:
>
> > RTE_EAL_RX_INTR will be removed from v2.2. It's only used to avoid
> ABI(unannounced) broken in v2.1.
> > The usrs
On Fri, 29 May 2015 16:45:25 +0800
Cunming Liang wrote:
> RTE_EAL_RX_INTR will be removed from v2.2. It's only used to avoid
> ABI(unannounced) broken in v2.1.
> The usrs should make sure understand the impact before turning on the feature.
> There are two abi changes required in this interrupt
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:48:01 +0800
"Liang, Cunming" wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 5/29/2015 11:27 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 May 2015 16:45:25 +0800
> > Cunming Liang wrote:
> >
> >> +#ifdef RTE_EAL_RX_INTR
> >> +extern int
> >> rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_ctl(uint8_t port_id, int
On 29/05/2015 10:45, Cunming Liang wrote:
> RTE_EAL_RX_INTR will be removed from v2.2. It's only used to avoid
> ABI(unannounced) broken in v2.1.
> The usrs should make sure understand the impact before turning on the feature.
> There are two abi changes required in this interrupt patch set.
>
RTE_EAL_RX_INTR will be removed from v2.2. It's only used to avoid
ABI(unannounced) broken in v2.1.
The usrs should make sure understand the impact before turning on the feature.
There are two abi changes required in this interrupt patch set.
They're 1) struct rte_intr_handle; 2) struct
On Fri, 29 May 2015 16:45:25 +0800
Cunming Liang wrote:
> +#ifdef RTE_EAL_RX_INTR
> +extern int
> rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_ctl(uint8_t port_id, int epfd, int op, void *data);
> +#else
> +static inline int
> +rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_ctl(uint8_t port_id, int epfd, int op, void *data)
> +{
> +
7 matches
Mail list logo