On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:03:07PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-06-01 21:19, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > I was thinking to implement the library options parsing in DPDK.
> > > But if the application implements its own options
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> I was thinking to implement the library options parsing in DPDK.
> But if the application implements its own options parsing without using
> the DPDK one, yes the option parsing is obviously done in the application.
>
> > I'd say,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2016-06-01 14:04, Yuanhan Liu:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I guess we (maybe just me :) have stated few times something like
> > "hey, this kind of stuff is good to have, but you are trying to
> > add an EAL CLI option for a
I recently felt tired enough of specifying various options for EAL, so I
came up to use ini-based configuration. EAL parameters from dedicated
section of ini file are parsed to argv array which is subsequently fed
to rte_eal_init(). Quite handy, but maybe a little overkill.
On 01.06.2016
2016-06-01 21:19, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 02:39:28PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > I was thinking to implement the library options parsing in DPDK.
> > But if the application implements its own options parsing without using
> > the DPDK one, yes the option parsing is obviously
:03 AM
To: Yuanhan Liu
Cc: "dev at dpdk.org" , Bruce Richardson , "Tan, Jianfeng" , Stephen Hemminger
, Christian Ehrhardt , Panu Matilainen , Olivier Matz
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] kernel paramters like DPDK CLI options
>2016-06-01 21:19, Yuanhan Liu:
>> On Wed, Jun 0
2016-06-01 19:40, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 12:17:50PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-06-01 14:04, Yuanhan Liu:
> > > Apparently, adding a new EAL option like "--force-legacy" looks
> > > wrong.
> > >
> > > The generic yet elegant solution I just thought of while having
> > >
Hi all,
I guess we (maybe just me :) have stated few times something like
"hey, this kind of stuff is good to have, but you are trying to
add an EAL CLI option for a specific subsystem/driver, which is
wrong".
One recent example that is still fresh in my mind is the one from
Christian [0], that
Hi,
2016-06-01 14:04, Yuanhan Liu:
> Hi all,
>
> I guess we (maybe just me :) have stated few times something like
> "hey, this kind of stuff is good to have, but you are trying to
> add an EAL CLI option for a specific subsystem/driver, which is
> wrong".
Yes
> One recent example that is
9 matches
Mail list logo
