> -Original Message-
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 7:00 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: Wang, Zhihong ; dev at dpdk.org; De Lara
> Guarch,
> Pablo
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] performance utility in testpmd
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 5:54 PM
> To: Wang, Zhihong
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/2] performance utility in testpmd
>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:54:12AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-04-20 18:43, Zhihong Wang:
> > This RFC patch proposes a general purpose forwarding engine in testpmd
> > namely "portfwd", to enable performance analysis and tuning for poll mode
> > drivers in vSwitching scenarios.
> >
> >
2016-04-20 18:43, Zhihong Wang:
> This RFC patch proposes a general purpose forwarding engine in testpmd
> namely "portfwd", to enable performance analysis and tuning for poll mode
> drivers in vSwitching scenarios.
>
>
> Problem statement
> -
>
> vSwitching is more I/O bound in
This RFC patch proposes a general purpose forwarding engine in testpmd
namely "portfwd", to enable performance analysis and tuning for poll mode
drivers in vSwitching scenarios.
Problem statement
-
vSwitching is more I/O bound in a lot of cases since there are a lot of
LLC/cross-
5 matches
Mail list logo