[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-10 Thread Ouyang, Changchun
Hi Michael, > -Original Message- > From: Qiu, Michael > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 12:03 AM > To: Ouyang, Changchun; Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation > > On 2014/12/9 22:19,

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-09 Thread Qiu, Michael
On 2014/12/9 22:19, Ouyang, Changchun wrote: > Hi Bruce, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Richardson, Bruce >> Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:47 PM >> To: Ouyang, Changchun >> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-09 Thread Ouyang, Changchun
Hi Bruce, > -Original Message- > From: Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:47 PM > To: Ouyang, Changchun > Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
; Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation > > > > 2014-12-09 05:41, Ouyang, Changchun: > > > Hi > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Qiu, Michael > >

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> >> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 5:31 PM > > >> To: Ouyang, Changchun > > >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org > > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio > > >> implementation > > >> > > >> Hi Changchun, > > >

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-09 Thread Ouyang, Changchun
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 2:12 PM > To: Ouyang, Changchun > Cc: Qiu, Michael; Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implem

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-09 Thread Ouyang, Changchun
Hi > -Original Message- > From: Qiu, Michael > Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 11:23 AM > To: Ouyang, Changchun; Thomas Monjalon; Stephen Hemminger > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation > > On 12/9/2014 9:

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-09 Thread Qiu, Michael
On 12/9/2014 9:11 AM, Ouyang, Changchun wrote: > Hi Thomas, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] >> Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 5:31 PM >> To: Ouyang, Changchun >> Cc: dev at dpdk.org >> Subjec

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/17] Single virtio implementation

2014-12-08 Thread Ouyang Changchun
This is RFC patch for single virtio implementation. Why we need single virtio? As we know currently there are at least 3 virtio PMD driver implementations: A) lib/librte_pmd_virtio(refer as virtio A); B) virtio_net_pmd by 6wind(refer as virtio B); C) virtio by