On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:38:31AM +, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi THomas,
>
>
>
> > > @@ -424,7 +425,10 @@ rte_eth_dev_socket_id(uint8_t port_id) {
> > > if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(port_id))
> > > return -1;
> > > - return rte_eth_devices[port_id].pci_dev->numa_node;
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2015 1:37 PM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard; Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/6] librte_ethe
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Iremonger, Bernard
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 12:39 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/6] librte_ether: add fields from
Hi THomas,
> > @@ -424,7 +425,10 @@ rte_eth_dev_socket_id(uint8_t port_id) {
> > if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(port_id))
> > return -1;
> > - return rte_eth_devices[port_id].pci_dev->numa_node;
> > + if (rte_eth_devices[port_id].dev_type == RTE_ETH_DEV_PCI)
> > +
2015-08-27 16:40, Bernard Iremonger:
> add dev_flags to rte_eth_dev, add macros for dev_flags.
> add numa_node to rte_eth_dev_data.
> use dev_type to distinguish between vdev's and pdev's.
> remove unused RTE_ETH_DEV_MAX.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger
[...]
> @@ -424,7 +425,10 @@
add dev_flags to rte_eth_dev, add macros for dev_flags.
add numa_node to rte_eth_dev_data.
use dev_type to distinguish between vdev's and pdev's.
remove unused RTE_ETH_DEV_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 19 +++
6 matches
Mail list logo
