On 2016/01/29 18:13, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:57:23PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:07:58PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> +static int
>>> +virt_read_pci_cfg(struct virtio_hw *hw, void *buf, size_t len, off_t
>>> offset)
>>> +{
>>> +
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:57:23PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:07:58PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> > +static int
> > +virt_read_pci_cfg(struct virtio_hw *hw, void *buf, size_t len, off_t
> > offset)
> > +{
> > + qtest_read_pci_cfg(hw, "virtio-net", buf, len,
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:07:58PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> +static int
> +virt_read_pci_cfg(struct virtio_hw *hw, void *buf, size_t len, off_t offset)
> +{
> + qtest_read_pci_cfg(hw, "virtio-net", buf, len, offset);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *
>
On 1/28/2016 10:44 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/01/27 19:03, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> + /* Set BAR region */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < NB_BAR; i++) {
>>> + switch (dev->bar[i].type) {
>>> + case QTEST_PCI_BAR_IO:
>>> +
On 2016/01/28 18:48, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/28/2016 10:47 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> On 2016/01/28 0:58, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>>> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> [snip]
+
+static int
+qtest_raw_recv(int fd, char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+ size_t len =
On 2016/01/28 15:15, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/28/2016 10:48 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> I measured it, and seems it takes 0.35 seconds in my environment.
>> This will be done only once when the port is initialized. Probably it's
>> not so heady.
> There are 256 x 32 loop of pci scan. That is too
On 2016/01/28 1:45, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> +qtest_find_pci_device(struct qtest_session *s, uint16_t bus, uint8_t device)
>> +{
>> +struct qtest_pci_device *dev;
>> +uint32_t val;
>> +
>> +val = qtest_pci_inl(s, bus, device, 0, 0);
>> +
On 2016/01/28 0:58, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> [snip]
>> +
>> +static int
>> +qtest_raw_recv(int fd, char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> +size_t len = count;
>> +size_t total_len = 0;
>> +int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +while (len > 0) {
>> +
On 2016/01/27 19:03, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> +/* Set BAR region */
>> +for (i = 0; i < NB_BAR; i++) {
>> +switch (dev->bar[i].type) {
>> +case QTEST_PCI_BAR_IO:
>> +case QTEST_PCI_BAR_MEMORY_UNDER_1MB:
>> +
On 2016/01/27 18:39, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/26/2016 10:58 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> On 2016/01/25 19:15, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>>
>> BTW, my container implementation needed a QEMU patch in the case of
>> vhost-user.
>> But the patch has been merged in upstream QEMU, so we don't have this
>>
On 1/28/2016 10:48 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> I measured it, and seems it takes 0.35 seconds in my environment.
> This will be done only once when the port is initialized. Probably it's
> not so heady.
There are 256 x 32 loop of pci scan. That is too long if we dynamically
start/tear down the
On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> +qtest_find_pci_device(struct qtest_session *s, uint16_t bus, uint8_t device)
> +{
> + struct qtest_pci_device *dev;
> + uint32_t val;
> +
> + val = qtest_pci_inl(s, bus, device, 0, 0);
> + TAILQ_FOREACH(dev, >head, next) {
> +
On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> + /* Set BAR region */
> + for (i = 0; i < NB_BAR; i++) {
> + switch (dev->bar[i].type) {
> + case QTEST_PCI_BAR_IO:
> + case QTEST_PCI_BAR_MEMORY_UNDER_1MB:
> + case QTEST_PCI_BAR_MEMORY_32:
> +
On 1/26/2016 10:58 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/01/25 19:15, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>> On 1/22/2016 6:38 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> On 2016/01/22 17:14, Xie, Huawei wrote:
On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> virtio: Extend virtio-net PMD to support container environment
On 2016/01/25 19:29, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> +#define PCI_CONFIG_ADDR(_bus, _device, _function, _offset) ( \
>> +(1 << 31) | ((_bus) & 0xff) << 16 | ((_device) & 0x1f) << 11 | \
>> +((_function) & 0xf) << 8 | ((_offset) & 0xfc))
> (_function) &
On 2016/01/25 19:17, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> +static void
>> +qtest_handle_one_message(struct qtest_session *s, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +int ret;
>> +
>> +if (strncmp(buf, interrupt_message, strlen(interrupt_message)) == 0) {
>> +if
On 2016/01/25 19:15, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/22/2016 6:38 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> On 2016/01/22 17:14, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>>> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
virtio: Extend virtio-net PMD to support container environment
The patch adds a new virtio-net PMD
On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> +#define PCI_CONFIG_ADDR(_bus, _device, _function, _offset) ( \
> + (1 << 31) | ((_bus) & 0xff) << 16 | ((_device) & 0x1f) << 11 | \
> + ((_function) & 0xf) << 8 | ((_offset) & 0xfc))
(_function) & 0x7 ?
On 1/22/2016 6:38 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/01/22 17:14, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>>> virtio: Extend virtio-net PMD to support container environment
>>>
>>> The patch adds a new virtio-net PMD configuration that allows the PMD to
>>> work on host
On 2016/01/22 17:14, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> virtio: Extend virtio-net PMD to support container environment
>>
>> The patch adds a new virtio-net PMD configuration that allows the PMD to
>> work on host as if the PMD is in VM.
>> Here is new
On 1/21/2016 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> virtio: Extend virtio-net PMD to support container environment
>
> The patch adds a new virtio-net PMD configuration that allows the PMD to
> work on host as if the PMD is in VM.
> Here is new configuration for virtio-net PMD.
> -
virtio: Extend virtio-net PMD to support container environment
The patch adds a new virtio-net PMD configuration that allows the PMD to
work on host as if the PMD is in VM.
Here is new configuration for virtio-net PMD.
- CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_HOST_MODE
To use this mode, EAL needs physically
22 matches
Mail list logo
