On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:44:57AM +0530, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I took a quick look at the dpdk vfio code and spotted an invalid
> assumption that should probably be corrected ASAP. That is:
>
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h:
> #define VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(x) ((uint64_t) x
> Hi,
>
> 2016-07-27 16:14, Alex Williamson:
> > I took a quick look at the dpdk vfio code and spotted an invalid
> > assumption that should probably be corrected ASAP.
>
> It can theoretically be a bug but the value may never change in the kernel,
> right?
> So when you say ASAP, I feel it can
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:42:13 +
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2016-07-27 16:14, Alex Williamson:
> > > I took a quick look at the dpdk vfio code and spotted an invalid
> > > assumption that should probably be corrected ASAP.
> >
> > It can theoretically be a bug but the
Hi,
2016-07-27 16:14, Alex Williamson:
> I took a quick look at the dpdk vfio code and spotted an invalid
> assumption that should probably be corrected ASAP.
It can theoretically be a bug but the value may never change in the kernel,
right?
So when you say ASAP, I feel it can wait the next DPDK
Hi,
I took a quick look at the dpdk vfio code and spotted an invalid
assumption that should probably be corrected ASAP. That is:
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_vfio.h:
#define VFIO_GET_REGION_ADDR(x) ((uint64_t) x << 40ULL)
#define VFIO_GET_REGION_IDX(x) (x >> 40)
Region offset to index is an
5 matches
Mail list logo