Cristian,
Please see some comments below.
On 06/09/2014 03:25 PM, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> 1. As the name implies, pktmbuf should be used for packets and ctrlmbuf
> should be used for control messages . IMHO using pktmbuf to control
> messages is a confusing workaround.
If ctrlmbuf are
Hi Christian,
> We need a message type defined for message passing between cores, and
> pktmbuf is definitely not the right approach.
Could you please explain why a pktmbuf is not the right approach?
As proposed in http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-May/002759.html
I think the control mbuf
at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v2 22/23] Packet Framework IPv4 pipeline sample app
Hi Christian,
> We need a message type defined for message passing between cores, and
> pktmbuf is definitely not the right approach.
Could you please explain why a pktmbuf is not the right ap
Hi Cristian,
On 06/04/2014 08:08 PM, Cristian Dumitrescu wrote:
> This Packet Framework sample application illustrates the capabilities of the
> Intel DPDK Packet Framework toolbox.
>
> It creates different functional blocks used by a typical IPv4 framework like:
> flow classification,
To: Dumitrescu, Cristian; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [v2 22/23] Packet Framework IPv4 pipeline sample app
Hi Cristian,
On 06/04/2014 08:08 PM, Cristian Dumitrescu wrote:
> This Packet Framework sample application illustrates the capabilities of the
> Intel DPDK Packet Framework t
This Packet Framework sample application illustrates the capabilities of the
Intel DPDK Packet Framework toolbox.
It creates different functional blocks used by a typical IPv4 framework like:
flow classification, firewall, routing, etc.
CPU cores are connected together through standard
6 matches
Mail list logo
