[dpdk-dev] Change new libraries to have dpdk_ prefix instead of rte_

> >> -Original Message- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Declan Doherty >> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 2:29 PM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Change new libraries to have dpdk_ prefix instead of rte_ >>

[dpdk-dev] Change new libraries to have dpdk_ prefix instead of rte_

Thanks for commenting and making the debate alive :) 2016-04-05 14:03, Ananyev, Konstantin: > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Declan Doherty > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > > I think we could change the namespace before making this API st

[dpdk-dev] Change new libraries to have dpdk_ prefix instead of rte_

I'd like people opinion of Thomas proposal to have all new libraries use a dpdk_ prefix instead of rte_*. Although I agree that dpdk_ would probably make sense, I don't like the ascetics of inconsistent prefixes on dpdk libraries. Any comments? 2016-04-05 09:48, Trahe, Fiona: > From: Thomas

[dpdk-dev] Change new libraries to have dpdk_ prefix instead of rte_

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Declan Doherty > Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 2:29 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Change new libraries to have dpdk_ prefix instead of rte_ > > I'd like people opi