-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Glynn, Michael J
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 6:14 PM
To: users at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org; announce at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] FW: DPDK Community Survey - about to close
> ...
>
> Regarding
Just 2 minutes for DPDK ;)
http://surveymonkey.com/r/DPDK_Community_Survey
2016-08-02 14:39, Thomas Monjalon:
> Hi all,
>
> That's the first time a DPDK survey is published.
> It will help us in our future progress to decide what are the most
> important stuff to work on.
>
> Please do
-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Glynn, Michael J
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:46 PM
Hi all
As part of our ongoing efforts to improve DPDK, we'd like to hear your feedback!
We have created a number of DPDK-related questions here
Hi all
As part of our ongoing efforts to improve DPDK, we'd like to hear your feedback!
We have created a number of DPDK-related questions here
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DPDK_Community_Survey and want to hear your
views!!
The survey will close at midnight GMT on Thursday August 4th
Meeting Minutes for Community Call - May 11th 2014
Topic: DPDK 16.04 Retrospective
Facilitators: Mike Glynn (Intel), John McNamara (Intel)
Attendees: Christian Ehrhardt, Hemant Agrawal, Jan Viktorin, Mauricio Vasquez,
Mike Holmes, Stephen Hemminger, Thomas Monjalon, Naoyuki Mori, Tom Gall,
at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - 16.04 Retrospective - Wednesday May
11th
At the end of each release, we typically hold a retrospective within our
development team to discuss what went well, what could be improved etc. For
16.04, we thought it would be a good idea to try doing
At the end of each release, we typically hold a retrospective within our
development team to discuss what went well, what could be improved etc. For
16.04, we thought it would be a good idea to try doing this with the open
source community, so that everybody involved in the project can provide
>
> Tim
>
>>
>> Robert (Bob) Monkman
>> Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
>> 150 Rose Orchard Way
>> San Jose, Ca 95134
>> M: +1.510.676.5490
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
2016 2:16 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday. Apologies
> for the delay in sending these out.
>
> Attendees: Bob Monkman, Bruce Rich
Orchard Way
> San Jose, Ca 95134
> M: +1.510.676.5490
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:16 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev]
Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:16 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday. Apologies for the
delay in sending these out.
Attendees: Bob Monkman
m: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that
>
Hi Tim,
On 01/22/2016 07:19 PM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that a few
> of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a light-weight
> governance of DPDK. This would include things like management of DPDK events,
>
At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that a few
of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a light-weight
governance of DPDK. This would include things like management of DPDK events,
registering trademarks, and any required legal support etc.
dk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:02 PM
> To: Scott Nicholas; mdolan at linuxfoundation.org; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> One of the actions resulting from the discussion we had on project
> gov
One of the actions resulting from the discussion we had on project governance
at the Userspace event was to engage with the Linux Foundation to see if they
can provide a lightweight model for DPDK. This would cover things like managing
a marketing budget, event planning, trademarks etc. Scott
a time for this, before the holiday period if possible.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 5:51 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Suppor
: Prasun.Kapoor at caviumnetworks.com; Liu, Kin-Yip
P?edm?t: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
Tim,
Yes, and I have been meaning to ask Venky to send out the presentation again.
This was asked at the meeting and it fell through the cracks. I had wanted to
ping some of the ARM SoC
] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 9:51 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
I missed Tuesday's call as I was travelling, but I believe one of the outcomes
was to hold another call at the same time on Tuesday 8th to further discuss
I missed Tuesday's call as I was travelling, but I believe one of the outcomes
was to hold another call at the same time on Tuesday 8th to further discuss the
External Mempool Manager. Here are the details:
When:
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Dec 8,
mber 19, 2015 11:20 AM
> To: Bob Monkman; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
>
> Thanks for following up on this Bob. It's great to see this level of
> engagement from the ARM ecosystem. In order to facilitate this, we'll
> move our
...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:09 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK support for
ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:09 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
>
> There's been a lot of activity on the mailing
Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:09 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
There's been
There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK support for
ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace a new architecture.
We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would make a
good topic for a community call. This will give
Some great input Dave. We discussed a number of issues yesterday which, while
related, should probably be treated separately for clarity. For each of these,
I think we need to start with a clear problem statement and a concrete proposal
for change.
I've added some further comments on the
, and
possibly schedule a follow-up call in 2-3 weeks.
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 4:35 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0
&g
Thanks for the notes Tim!
I had intended to participate, but didn't realise that there was a
conflict with an OPNFV call at the same time, and a calendaring snafu.
In the interests of having some more focussed discussion, I have some
questions on the notes to get beyond passive voice. I think it
This is just a reminder that this call is on tomorrow, at the following times,
which is just under 24 hours from now.
Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM PDT
UTC-7 hours
Phoenix (U.S.A. -
> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
>
> When were you thinking of having the call?
I put the day and time at the end of the email, but it probably should have
been at the start! Apologies that this wasn't clear.
Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
There's been a good discussion on the mailing list on the Beyond DPDK 2.0
thread. To supplement this, we'd like to have a community call for people to
air their views, and to help progress things towards a conclusion. It'll be an
open format, so people can bring up whatever issues they want,
Hi Tim,
When were you thinking of having the call?
It's not been explicit, but can I assume that this call will also be
promoted among potential supporters of the project who may not be on
this list? I would be interested to get the perspective from the people
who are perhaps not developers who
2015-04-24 09:14, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> Hi Tim,
>
> Thank you for your help in recording this readout!
> The slides that you attached to the email are dropped by the dpdk.org email
> server.
No, they are not dropped:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/016842.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:17 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Cc: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: DPDK Community Call - Software QoS
>
> 2015-04-24 09:14, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> >
video, when
available. What do you think?
Regards,
Cristian
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 2:24 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 4:41 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS
>
> Agenda:
> - Software Quality of Service (Cristian Dumitrescu
> From: O'driscoll, Tim
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:21:40 +
> > "O'driscoll, Tim" wrote:
> >
> > > We had our last community call in December, and then took a break over
> > the holiday
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:39:17 +
"O'driscoll, Tim" wrote:
> > From: O'driscoll, Tim
> >
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> > >
> > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:21:40 +
> > > "O'driscoll, Tim" wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 5:11 PM
> To: O'driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call, Monday 2nd February, 17:00
> GMT
>
> O
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:21:40 +
"O'driscoll, Tim" wrote:
> We had our last community call in December, and then took a break over the
> holiday period. I think we should reinstate these, so I've scheduled the next
> one for Monday 2nd February. Since our last
Tim,
Great, thanks! Keep on the good work and recording in the future.
The quality of the Audio is superb!
Kevin
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:26 AM, O'driscoll, Tim
wrote:
> The video is now accessible at: http://youtu.be/AbHQ4YaWY90. Thomas may want
> to add a link
The video is now accessible at: http://youtu.be/AbHQ4YaWY90. Thomas may want to
add a link to this from somewhere on the dpdk.org page.
Tim
> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
>
> Hi,
> >I'll post a recording of it soon.
> Great idea! most welcomed!
>
> Kevin
>
>
> On Thu,
Hi Kevin,
> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time
> Just a short question - is this still intended to be held ?
We had our second call earlier this week, on Tuesday. I'll post a recording of
it soon.
The next call will be in 2
alls, please let
> me know.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
>> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
>&g
DK for non-rebuilding users.
>
> Neil
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tim
> >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> > > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
> > > T
as suggestions for topics for future calls, please let
> me know.
>
ABI versioning, in support of packaging the DPDK for non-rebuilding users.
Neil
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, T
nal Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st
> October
>
> This is just a reminder for
This is just a reminder for anybody who's interested that this will be on in 30
minutes, and that we'll be discussing the feature list for the DPDK 2.0 release
in March 2015.
Audio bridge details are:
France: +33 1588 77298
Germany:+49 8999 143191
Israel: +972 2589 6577
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 5:22 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October
>
> We're planning to hol
We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday 31st
October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so we've chosen
to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is the morning in the USA.
This does unfortunately limit participation from PRC, Japan and
Welcome to the DPDK community. Please, use this mailing list to share
your patches, your questions and we'll provide you a best effort follow
up. Please, note that this mailing list cannot be used for a commercial
support. It is provided as-is.
Anyone can contribute, you are welcomed.
Best
51 matches
Mail list logo