eimear.morrissey at ie.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Arnon Warshavsky wrote on 10/19/2015 03:46:22 PM:
> >
> > > From: Arnon Warshavsky
> > > To: Eimear Morrissey/Ireland/IBM at IBMIE
> > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > > Date: 10/19/2015 03:46 PM
> >
> &
> > Date: 10/19/2015 03:46 PM
>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Inconsistent statistics counters for pmd_i40e
> >
> > Hi Eimear
> >
> > This is the link I have.
> > https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/24769
> >
> > I guess that the versio
Arnon Warshavsky wrote on 10/22/2015 12:12:47 PM:
> From: Arnon Warshavsky
> To: Eimear Morrissey/Ireland/IBM at IBMIE
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Date: 10/22/2015 12:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Inconsistent statistics counters for pmd_i40e
>
> You are right.
> Given t
Arnon Warshavsky wrote on 10/19/2015 03:46:22 PM:
> From: Arnon Warshavsky
> To: Eimear Morrissey/Ireland/IBM at IBMIE
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Date: 10/19/2015 03:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Inconsistent statistics counters for pmd_i40e
>
> Hi Eimear
>
> This
<
eimear.morrissey at ie.ibm.com> wrote:
> Arnon Warshavsky wrote on 10/19/2015 03:01:46 PM:
>
> > From: Arnon Warshavsky
> > To: Eimear Morrissey/Ireland/IBM at IBMIE
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Date: 10/19/2015 03:01 PM
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Inc
Hi Eimear,
I just experienced the same problem with firmware versions 4.23 and 4.33
(dpdk 2.0). Did not get to try the latest which is 4.5.
Looking at the code, I don't see that this counter is being read any
differently than its peer counters and I suspect the nic itself.
Can you tell which
Arnon Warshavsky wrote on 10/19/2015 03:01:46 PM:
> From: Arnon Warshavsky
> To: Eimear Morrissey/Ireland/IBM at IBMIE
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Date: 10/19/2015 03:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Inconsistent statistics counters for pmd_i40e
>
> Hi Eimear,
>
> I just e
Hi,
I'm having issues measuring packets dropped at the NIC in both the 2.0.0
and 2.1.0 versions of DPDK on an X710 Intel NIC.
In dpdk-2.0.0
Using rte_eth_xstats the rx_packets and rx_bytes counters increase as
expected, however rx_missed_errors is always 0 even if a sleep statement is
added
8 matches
Mail list logo