On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 02:32:06PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 05/10/2017 14:12, Olivier MATZ:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 08:48:29PM +, Eads, Gage wrote:
> > > I believe I've spotted an issue in the way inter-PMD dependencies are
> > > handled when building shared libraries. The depdirs_r
05/10/2017 14:12, Olivier MATZ:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 08:48:29PM +, Eads, Gage wrote:
> > I believe I've spotted an issue in the way inter-PMD dependencies are
> > handled when building shared libraries. The depdirs_rule in
> > mk/rte.subdir.mk relies on DEPDIRS-xyz containing the names o
Hi Gage,
+CC Thomas, Bruce
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 08:48:29PM +, Eads, Gage wrote:
> I believe I've spotted an issue in the way inter-PMD dependencies are handled
> when building shared libraries. The depdirs_rule in mk/rte.subdir.mk relies
> on DEPDIRS-xyz containing the names of subdirect
I believe I've spotted an issue in the way inter-PMD dependencies are handled
when building shared libraries. The depdirs_rule in mk/rte.subdir.mk relies on
DEPDIRS-xyz containing the names of subdirectories that xyz depends on. In
mk/rte.lib.mk, these DEPDIRS are converted into LDLIBS. This wor
4 matches
Mail list logo