Hello Mauro,
14/02/2014 11:28, Mauro Annarumma :
> Now I'm testing if the FDIR really works properly also on the X540 ;
> if it works, I will provide a patch.
Have you tested FDIR on X540?
--
Thomas
lon at 6wind.com
> To: fulvio.risso at polito.it
> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:47:21 +0100
> CC: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Is Flow Director supported on the x540 chipset?
>
> Hi Fulvio,
>
> 17/01/2014 12:24, Maxime Leroy:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, Fulvio Ris
ort 1 (ret=-5)*
> Please stop the ports first
> Done
> testpmd>
>
> *ret=-5 is the result of the rte_eth_dev_start function
>
> I guess someone was able to use FDIR, at least in the testpmd application.
> What am I doing wrong?
> Best regards
>
> > Fro
Hi Fulvio,
17/01/2014 12:24, Maxime Leroy:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014, Fulvio Risso wrote:
> > by digging into the DPDK code it seems to me that FDIR is not supported
> > on the x540 chipset, while it is supported on 82599.
[...]
> > Is there any plan to support FDIR to the x540 chipset?
>
[...]
>
Hi Fulvio,
I have been checked few information about the datasheet of the X540 card.
The X540 card is a derivative of the 82599. It's very similar to the 82599 card.
The both cards use the same hardware registers for the flow director.
Thus, the current code of the dpdk for the flow director
Dear all,
by digging into the DPDK code it seems to me that FDIR is not supported
on the x540 chipset, while it is supported on 82599.
Another message seems to mention the same problem here:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2013-November/000806.html
Is there any plan to support FDIR to the
6 matches
Mail list logo
