[dpdk-dev] URGENT please help. Issue on ixgbe_tx_free_bufs version 2.0.0

2015-11-17 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 07:58:27PM -0300, Ariel Rodriguez wrote: > Hi Bruce, im going to list the results after the test?s. > > I will start with the second hint you proposed: > > 2) I upgrade our custom dpdk application with the latest dpdk code (2.1.0) > and the issue still there. > > 1) I

[dpdk-dev] URGENT please help. Issue on ixgbe_tx_free_bufs version 2.0.0

2015-11-15 Thread Ariel Rodriguez
Hi Bruce, im going to list the results after the test?s. I will start with the second hint you proposed: 2) I upgrade our custom dpdk application with the latest dpdk code (2.1.0) and the issue still there. 1) I test the load balancer app with the latest dpdk code (2.1.0) with the nic 82599ES

[dpdk-dev] URGENT please help. Issue on ixgbe_tx_free_bufs version 2.0.0

2015-11-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:35:21AM -0300, Ariel Rodriguez wrote: > Dear dpdk experts. > > Im having a recurrent segmentation fault under the > function ixgbe_tx_free_bufs (ixgbe_rxtx.c:150) (i enable -g3 -O0). > > Surfing the core dump i find out this: > > txep = &(txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd

[dpdk-dev] URGENT please help. Issue on ixgbe_tx_free_bufs version 2.0.0

2015-11-10 Thread Ariel Rodriguez
Dear dpdk experts. Im having a recurrent segmentation fault under the function ixgbe_tx_free_bufs (ixgbe_rxtx.c:150) (i enable -g3 -O0). Surfing the core dump i find out this: txep = &(txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1)]); txq->tx_next_dd = 31 txq->txq->tx_rs_thresh=32