> > > The right name of ethdev should be dpdk_netdev. However:
> > > 1/ We are using rte_ prefix in the code and library names.
> > > 2/ The API uses rte_ethdev
> > > That's why 16.11 will just have the rte_ prefix prepended to
> > > the library filename as every other libraries.
> > >
> > > Signed
2016-07-28 11:29, Christian Ehrhardt:
> Just curious, do we already know by looking ahead if ethdev will get an ABI
> bump anyway?
> So will the transition be:
> a) libethdev4 -> librte_ethdev5
> b)libethdev4 -> librte_ethdev4
> If it is b) would/should one provide a compat symlink then in your Opi
Hi Thomas,
just my two cents as Ubuntu DPDK maintainer (and part of the Debian Team
that does the same).
(Yeah I really could reuse it three times :-) )
It will be a bit of effort to adapt, but should be no rocket-science.
I like that eventually the namespace will be cleaner.
Just curious, do we
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:22:21 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> The right name of ethdev should be dpdk_netdev. However:
> 1/ We are using rte_ prefix in the code and library names.
> 2/ The API uses rte_ethdev
> That's why 16.11 will just have the rte_ prefix prepended to
> the library filename as e
4 matches
Mail list logo
