[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Alejandro Lucero < alejandro.lucero at netronome.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bruce Richardson < > bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:24:28PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: >> > On Monday 24 October 2016

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:49 PM > > We should keep in mind that today we have the seqn field but it is not > used by any PMD. In case it is implemented, would it be a per-queue > sequence

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

About the mbuf timestamp (regardless of size etc.) accuracy: We should also consider the clock source. If the NIC HW is the clock source, there will be a fixed offset from the CPU's clock, but there will also be varying drift (they have separate XTALs). And if there are multiple NICs, there

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 7:01 PM > To: Adrien Mazarguil; Morten Br?rup > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > -Original

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

; Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Morten Br?rup > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > > Hi Olivier, > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Matz > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 201

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Adrien Mazarguil > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 5:50 PM > To: Morten Br?rup > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 04:11:45PM +0

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

Comments at the end. > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Pattan, Reshma > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 3:35 PM > To: Olivier Matz > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Morten Br?rup > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > Hi Olivi

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

> -Original Message- > From: Morten Br?rup [mailto:mb at smartsharesystems.com] > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 3:12 PM > To: Pattan, Reshma ; Olivier Matz > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > Comments at the end. &

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

Morten Br?rup > >> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson at intel.com] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:20 PM > >>> To: Morten Br?rup > >>> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil; Wiles, Keit

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

> From: Alejandro Lucero [mailto:alejandro.lucero at netronome.com] > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bruce Richardson intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:24:28PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > > > On Monday 24 October 2016 09:55 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 24,

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Bruce Richardson < bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:24:28PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > > On Monday 24 October 2016 09:55 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > > > >

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

On Monday 24 October 2016 09:55 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >>> On Oct 24, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Morten Br?rup >>> wrote: >>> >>> First of all: Thanks for a great DPDK Userspace 2016! >>> >>> >>> >>> Continuing the Userspace

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

first cache lines. > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:54 PM > To: Ramia, Kannan Babu > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz ; Morten Br?rup > ; Ananyev, Konstantin intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce ; Wi

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

On 10/25/2016 04:25 PM, Morten Br?rup wrote: > It might also make sense documenting the mbuf fields in more detail > somewhere. E.g. the need for nb_segs in the NIC's TX handler. Good point, I'll do it at the same time than the first rework proposition.

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

Med venlig hilsen / kind regards - Morten Br?rup > -Original Message- > From: Ananyev, Konstantin [mailto:konstantin.ananyev at intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 3:39 PM > To: Olivier Matz; Richardson, Bruce; Morten Br?rup > Cc: Adrien Mazarguil; Wiles, Keith; dev a

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

:14 PM > > To: Adrien Mazarguil > > Cc: Morten Br?rup; Wiles, Keith; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz; Oleg > > Kuporosov > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:04:44PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 2

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

2016-10-25 13:04, Ramia, Kannan Babu: > Port filed is important meta information for the application use like > CGNAT vEPC functions etc. > I strongly recommend to keep the field in mind meta. Have you tried to move this field outside of the mbuf? What is the performance degradation? We need more

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

2016-10-25 15:00, Olivier Matz: > On 10/25/2016 12:22 PM, Morten Br?rup wrote: > > From: Ananyev, Konstantin > >> From: Bruce Richardson > >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:47:16PM +0200, Morten Br?rup wrote: > From: Bruce Richardson > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

I support that! Med venlig hilsen / kind regards - Morten Br?rup > -Original Message- > From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 3:14 PM > To: Morten Br?rup; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: mbuf changes > > Hi, > > On 10/24/2016 05:49 PM,

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

Comments inline. Med venlig hilsen / kind regards - Morten Br?rup > -Original Message- > From: Shreyansh Jain [mailto:shreyansh.jain at nxp.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 1:54 PM > To: Bruce Richardson > Cc: Wiles, Keith; Morten Br?rup; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz > Subject:

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

ce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson at intel.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:20 PM >>> To: Morten Br?rup >>> Cc: Adrien Mazarguil; Wiles, Keith; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz; Oleg >>> Kuporosov >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf cha

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

g; Olivier Matz; Oleg > Kuporosov > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:16:29PM +0200, Morten Br?rup wrote: > > Comments inline. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

: dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz ; Morten Br?rup ; Ananyev, Konstantin ; Richardson, Bruce ; Wiles, Keith Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes 2016-10-25 13:04, Ramia, Kannan Babu: > Port filed is important meta information for the application use like > CGNAT vEPC functions etc. > I

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

en Br?rup > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:39 AM > > > > To: Bruce Richardson > > > > Cc: Wil

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

yev, > >> Konstantin > >> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 12:03 PM > >> To: Richardson, Bruce; Morten Br?rup > >> Cc: Wiles, Keith; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz > >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > >> > >> Hi everyone, > >>

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

Of Bruce Richardson > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 1:14 PM > > > To: Adrien Mazarguil > > > Cc: Morten Br?rup; Wiles, Keith; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz; Oleg > > > Kuporosov > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > > > &

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:20 PM > > To: Morten Br?rup > > Cc: Adrien Mazarguil; Wiles, Keith; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz; Oleg > > Kuporosov > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:16:29PM +0200, Morten Br?rup wrote: > > &g

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

uporosov > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > > On 10/25/2016 02:45 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:33:55PM +0200, Morten Br?rup wrote: > >> Comments at the end. > >> > >> Med venlig hilsen / kind regards >

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

> Cc: Morten Br?rup; Wiles, Keith; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz; Oleg > > Kuporosov > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:04:44PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:11:04PM +0200, Morten Br?

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:24:28PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > On Monday 24 October 2016 09:55 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 24, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Morten Br?rup > > > smartsharesystems.com> wrote: > > > > >

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:39 AM > > To: Bruce Richardson > > Cc: Wiles, Keith; Morten Br?rup; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz; Oleg > > Kuporosov > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:25:38PM +0100, Bruce Richardson w

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

ubject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > Hi everyone, > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 9:54 AM > > To: Morten Br?rup > > Cc: Wiles, Keith ; dev at

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

iginal Message- > > > From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:39 AM > > > To: Bruce Richardson > > > Cc: Wiles, Keith; Morten Br?rup; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz; Oleg > > > Kuporosov > >

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

vier Matz; Oleg > Kuporosov > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:25:38PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: > [...] > > > > On Oct 24, 2016, at 10:

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:25:38PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: [...] > > > On Oct 24, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Morten Br?rup > > > wrote: [...] > > > 5. > > > > > > And here?s something new to think about: > > > > > > m->next already

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

Hi everyone, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 9:54 AM > To: Morten Br?rup > Cc: Wiles, Keith ; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf change

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

Monday, October 24, 2016 6:26 PM > > To: Wiles, Keith > > Cc: Morten Br?rup; dev at dpdk.org; Olivier Matz > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] mbuf changes > > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 24, 2016, at 10

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

First of all: Thanks for a great DPDK Userspace 2016! Continuing the Userspace discussion about Olivier Matz?s proposed mbuf changes... 1. Stephen Hemminger had a noteworthy general comment about keeping metadata for the NIC in the appropriate section of the mbuf: Metadata generated by

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: > > > On Oct 24, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Morten Br?rup > > wrote: > > > > First of all: Thanks for a great DPDK Userspace 2016! > > > > > > > > Continuing the Userspace discussion about Olivier Matz?s proposed mbuf > > changes...

[dpdk-dev] mbuf changes

> On Oct 24, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Morten Br?rup > wrote: > > First of all: Thanks for a great DPDK Userspace 2016! > > > > Continuing the Userspace discussion about Olivier Matz?s proposed mbuf > changes... > > > > 1. > > Stephen Hemminger had a noteworthy general comment about keeping