Stephen, what was the main reason you use red-black tree instead of dir-24-8?
Did you switch to using trees because of too big memory working set of
dir-24-8 algorithm?
2016-04-19 18:46 GMT+03:00 Stephen Hemminger :
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:11:11 +0300
> ? ??? wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
>I just realizied that my patch could be confusing. I want to emphasize that it
>contains two completly different and independent set of changes. One is new
>rule subsystem and the other is 64 bit next hop. Maybe I should've prepared a
>patch with only rule changes, but I wanted to discuss fist
I just realizied that my patch could be confusing. I want to emphasize that it
contains two completly different and independent set of changes. One is new
rule subsystem and the other is 64 bit next hop. Maybe I should've prepared a
patch with only rule changes, but I wanted to discuss fist and
Hi Alexander,
Why next_hop is 64 bit long?
2016-04-19 18:46 GMT+03:00 Stephen Hemminger :
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:11:11 +0300
> ? ??? wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Doing some test with rte_lpm (adding/deleting bgp full table rules) I
> > noticed that
> > rule subsystem is very slow
Hi.
Doing some test with rte_lpm (adding/deleting bgp full table rules) I
noticed that
rule subsystem is very slow even considering that probably it was never
designed for using
in a data forwarding plane. So I want to propose some changes to the "rule"
subsystem.
I reimplemented rule part ot
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:11:11 +0300
? ??? wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Doing some test with rte_lpm (adding/deleting bgp full table rules) I
> noticed that
> rule subsystem is very slow even considering that probably it was never
> designed for using
> in a data forwarding plane. So I want to
6 matches
Mail list logo
