Hi Oliver
> -Original Message-
> From: Olivier MATZ [mailto:olivier.matz at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:03 PM
> On 07/27/2016 11:51 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:11:13AM +, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> There was lengthy
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:32:44AM +0200, Olivier MATZ wrote:
Hi Olivier,
> Hi Hemant, Jerin,
>
> On 07/27/2016 11:51 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:11:13AM +, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>
> >
> > I agree, To me, this is very bad. I have raised this concern earlier
> >
Hi Hemant, Jerin,
On 07/27/2016 11:51 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:11:13AM +, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
>> Hi,
>> There was lengthy discussions w.r.t external mempool
>> patches. However, I am still finding usages issue with the agreed approach.
>>
>> The
2016-07-27 16:52, Hemant Agrawal:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2016-07-27 13:23, Hemant Agrawal:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > > 2016-07-27 15:21, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > > If we agree on this then may be I can send the
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 7:05 PM
> To: Hemant Agrawal
> Cc: Jerin Jacob ; David Hunt
> ; dev at dpdk.org; olivier.matz at 6wind.com;
> viktorin at rehivetech.com; Shreyansh Jain
> Subject: Re:
2016-07-27 13:23, Hemant Agrawal:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2016-07-27 15:21, Jerin Jacob:
> > > If we agree on this then may be I can send the API deprecation notices
> > > for rte_mempool_create for v16.11
> >
> > It would have been a lot better to send a
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:11:13AM +, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> Hi,
>There was lengthy discussions w.r.t external mempool patches.
> However, I am still finding usages issue with the agreed approach.
>
> The existing API to create packet mempool, "rte_pktmbuf_pool_create" does
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> 2016-07-27 15:21, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:11:13AM +, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > > This is not a user friendly approach to ask for changing 1 API to 6 new
> > > APIs.
> Or, am I
2016-07-27 15:21, Jerin Jacob:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:11:13AM +, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > This is not a user friendly approach to ask for changing 1 API to 6 new
> > APIs. Or, am I missing something?
>
> I agree, To me, this is very bad. I have raised this concern earlier
> also
>
>
Hi,
There was lengthy discussions w.r.t external mempool patches.
However, I am still finding usages issue with the agreed approach.
The existing API to create packet mempool, "rte_pktmbuf_pool_create" does not
provide the option to change the object init iterator. This may be
10 matches
Mail list logo
