nstantin
> ; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
> ; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] mempool/nb_stack: add non-blocking
> stack mempool
>
> 19/01/2019 01:00, Eads, Gage:
> > > > I am wondering if it makes sense to decouple the NB stack data
> > > >
19/01/2019 01:00, Eads, Gage:
> > > I am wondering if it makes sense to decouple the NB stack data
> > > structure from mempool driver (similar to rte_ring)? I see that stack
> > > based mempool implements the stack data structure in the driver. But,
> > > NB stack might not be such a trivial data
PM
> > To: Eads, Gage ; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: olivier.m...@6wind.com; arybche...@solarflare.com; Richardson,
> > Bruce ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> > ; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
> > ; nd ; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > ; nd
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PA
> ; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
> ; nd ; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> ; nd
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] mempool/nb_stack: add non-blocking
> stack mempool
>
> Hi Gage,
> Thank you for your contribution on non-blocking data structures. I think
> they
> are im
Hi Gage,
Thank you for your contribution on non-blocking data structures. I think
they are important to extend DPDK into additional use cases.
I am wondering if it makes sense to decouple the NB stack data structure from
mempool driver (similar to rte_ring)? I see that stack based mempool i
5 matches
Mail list logo
