On 12/24/2015 2:49 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 6:38 PM
>> To: Xie, Huawei
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; dprovan at bivio.net
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev]
On 2015/12/22 13:47, Rich Lane wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:01:25AM -0800, Rich Lane wrote:
>>> I'm using the vhost callbacks and struct virtio_net with the vhost PMD
>> in a few
>>> ways:
>> Rich, thanks for the info!
>>
>>> 1.
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:26:17PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-23 10:09, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 09:55:54AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:38:30PM +, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> > > > On 12/22/2015 7:39 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > > I tried to
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 09:45:19AM +, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> This initialisation of nb_rx_queues and nb_tx_queues has been removed
> from eth_virtio_dev_init.
>
> The nb_rx_queues and nb_tx_queues were being initialised in
> eth_virtio_dev_init
> before the tx_queues and rx_queues arrays
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:00:15PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-23 10:44, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 01:38:29AM -0800, Rich Lane wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Yuanhan Liu > > linux.intel.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 08:47:28PM
On 2015/12/24 12:09, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2015/12/22 13:47, Rich Lane wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Yuanhan Liu
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:01:25AM -0800, Rich Lane wrote:
I'm using the vhost callbacks and struct virtio_net with the vhost PMD
>>> in a few
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09:10PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2015/12/22 13:47, Rich Lane wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Yuanhan Liu > linux.intel.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:01:25AM -0800, Rich Lane wrote:
> >>> I'm using the vhost callbacks and struct
On 2015/12/24 12:51, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:00:15PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2015-12-23 10:44, Yuanhan Liu:
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 01:38:29AM -0800, Rich Lane wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Yuanhan Liu >>> linux.intel.com>
wrote:
On 2015/12/24 13:00, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09:10PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> On 2015/12/22 13:47, Rich Lane wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Yuanhan Liu >> linux.intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:01:25AM -0800, Rich Lane wrote:
I see codes as below in example directory, and I wonder it is effective.
Coherent IO is adopted to modern architectures,
so I think that DMA initiation by rte_eth_rx_burst() might already fulfills
cache lines of RX buffers.
Do I really need to call rte_prefetchX()?
nb_rx =
On 2015/12/24 14:37, Rich Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>
>> On 2015/12/22 13:47, Rich Lane wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Yuanhan Liu <
>> yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:01:25AM -0800, Rich Lane
On 12/23/2015 8:19 PM, Reshma Pattan wrote:
> Macros RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_ERR_RET and RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_RET
> are blocking the secondary process from using the APIs.
> API access should be given to both secondary and primary.
Just as the log says, is it safe to do so?
Thanks,
Michael
> Fix
On 12/23/2015 3:38 PM, He, Shaopeng wrote:
> This patch series adds interrupt mode support for fm10k,
> contains four major parts:
>
> 1. implement rx_descriptor_done function in fm10k
> 2. add rx interrupt support in fm10k PF and VF
> 3. make sure default VID available in dev_init in fm10k
> 4.
On 12/24/2015 11:07 AM, Zhihong Wang wrote:
> Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang
> ---
> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 23 +++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> index
On 12/24/2015 11:07 AM, Zhihong Wang wrote:
> Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang
> ---
> examples/l2fwd/main.c | 25 +
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l2fwd/main.c b/examples/l2fwd/main.c
> index
On 11/18/2015 6:30 PM, Zhihong Wang wrote:
> This RFC patch aims to reduce DPDK initialization time, which is important in
> cases such as micro service.
>
> Changes are:
>
> 1. Reduce timer initialization time
>
> 2. Remove unnecessary hugepage zero-filling operations
>
> With this patch:
>
> 1.
Hello,
I am a PhD student and I am doing research about verification of network
applications. In order to maximize the utility of our efforts for the
networking community, our team would grateful if you answer a couple of
questions:
http://goo.gl/cL760p
This short form should take just 2-3
> > +/* When we receive a INT signal, close all ports */ static void
> > +sigint_handler(__rte_unused int signum) {
> > + unsigned portid;
> > +
> > + printf("Preparing to exit...\n");
>
> Better to notice user "Signal xxx received, reparing to exit... "
Can do that.
>
> > +
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhihong Wang
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 8:03 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] examples/l3fwd: Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in
> l3fwd
>
> Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in
Hi Jijiang,
See my comments inline below prefixewd with IB>
Ivan
On 12/18/2015 03:00 AM, Liu, Jijiang wrote:
> Hi Boule,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ivan Boule [mailto:ivan.boule at 6wind.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 4:50 PM
>> To: Liu, Jijiang
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
>>
Hi Tetsuya,
After several days' studying your patch, I have some questions as follows:
1. Is physically-contig memory really necessary?
This is a too strong requirement IMHO. IVSHMEM doesn't require this in its
original meaning. So how do you think of
Huawei Xie's idea of using virtual address
> -Original Message-
> From: Qiu, Michael
> On 12/23/2015 8:19 PM, Reshma Pattan wrote:
> > Macros RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_ERR_RET and
> RTE_PROC_PRIMARY_OR_RET are
> > blocking the secondary process from using the APIs.
> > API access should be given to both secondary and primary.
>
> Just
Hi Przemek,
Thank you so much for your quick response.
The guide(
https://github.com/openstack/networking-ovs-dpdk/blob/stable/kilo/doc/source/getstarted/ubuntu.rst
) which you have suggested that is for openstack vhost user installations
with devstack.
Can't we have any reference for
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:03:15 -0500
Zhihong Wang wrote:
> +/* When we receive a INT signal, close all ports */
> +static void
> +sigint_handler(__rte_unused int signum)
> +{
> + unsigned portid, nb_ports;
> +
> + printf("Preparing to exit...\n");
> + nb_ports = rte_eth_dev_count();
>
On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 11:30:27 +0800
Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:26:17PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-12-23 10:09, Yuanhan Liu:
> > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 09:55:54AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:38:30PM +, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> > > >
This patch handles SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd, l2fwd, and l3fwd, make sure
all ports are properly stopped and closed.
For virtual ports, the stop and close function may deal with resource cleanup,
such as socket files unlinking.
--
Changes in v2:
1. Make sure graceful exit for
Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in testpmd.
Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang
---
app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 19 +--
app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 38 --
app/test-pmd/testpmd.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git
Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l2fwd.
Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang
---
examples/l2fwd/main.c | 60 +++
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
diff --git a/examples/l2fwd/main.c b/examples/l2fwd/main.c
index 720fd5a..75899dd 100644
---
Handle SIGINT and SIGTERM in l3fwd.
Signed-off-by: Zhihong Wang
---
examples/l3fwd/main.c | 110 +-
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/main.c b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
index 5b0c2dd..b9f3232 100644
---
29 matches
Mail list logo
