Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h
b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h
index 857dc3e..940ec18 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h
+++
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:17:46AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >>>This is something I've thought about while writing the code, the reason I
> >>>keep it as one function body is that:
> >>>
> >>> 1. This function is very performance sensitive, and we need full control
> >>> of
> >>>code
-Original Message-
From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan [mailto:gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: 2016?8?16? 18:28
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Chao Zhu ; Bruce Richardson
; Konstantin Ananyev
; Thomas Monjalon ;
Cristian Dumitrescu ; Pradeep
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/9] enable lpm, acl and
On 8/16/2016 8:26 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:42:33PM +0530, Pankaj Chauhan wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am working on an NXP platform where we intend to use user space vhost
>> switch (examples/vhost) as backend for VIRTIO devices. But there are two
>> limitations in current
[ Yes I'm late to this party, apologies for missing the first round of
discussion ]
On 07/28/2016 03:33 PM, Mcnamara, John wrote:
>
> This document sets out the guidelines for DPDK Stable Releases and Long Term
> Support releases (LTS) based on the initial RFC and comments:
>
The bad L4 checksum flag was set on IP packets which were not
also TCP or UDP packets. This includes ICMP, IGMP and OSPF packets.
L4 ptypes were being treated as bits instead of values within the
L4 mask causing the code to check L4 checksum in the completion
queue and incorrectly set the L4 bad
> -Original Message-
> From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmatilai at redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:30 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John ; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Stable Releases and Long Term Support
>
> ...
>
> > ABI
> > ---
> >
> > The Stable Release should
Hi Jianfeng,
On 08/17/2016 04:33 AM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review below proposal of Pankaj and myself after an offline
> discussion. (Pankaj, please correct me if I'm going somewhere wrong).
>
> a. Remove HW dependent option, --strip-vlan, because different kinds of
> NICs behave
On 08/17/2016 08:41 AM, Wang, Zhihong wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:38 AM
>> To: Wang, Zhihong
>> Cc: Maxime Coquelin ; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] optimize
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:45:26AM +, Wang, Zhihong wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:00 PM
> > To: Wang, Zhihong ; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] optimize
Hi,
Please review below proposal of Pankaj and myself after an offline
discussion. (Pankaj, please correct me if I'm going somewhere wrong).
a. Remove HW dependent option, --strip-vlan, because different kinds of
NICs behave differently. It's a bug fix.
b. Abstract switching logic into a
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 5:18 PM
> To: Wang, Zhihong ; Yuanhan Liu
>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] optimize vhost enqueue
>
>
>
> On 08/17/2016 08:41 AM, Wang,
Hi,
Atomic Rules is new to the DPDK community. We attended the DPDK Summit last
week and received terrific advice and encouragement. We are developing a
DPDK PMD for our Arkville product which is a DPDK-aware data mover, capable
of marshaling packets between FPGA/ASIC gates with AXI interfaces
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 10:38 AM
> To: Wang, Zhihong
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin ; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] optimize vhost enqueue
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:45:26AM
> -Original Message-
> From: Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:58 AM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix dropping packets with Ethertype 0x88A8
>
> Refer to FW default setting, Ethertype 0x88A8 is treated as S-TAG,
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 10:00 PM
> To: Wang, Zhihong ; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] optimize vhost enqueue
>
> Hi Zhihong,
>
> On 08/16/2016 05:50 AM, Zhihong Wang wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:30 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei
> Subject: [PATCH] net/i40e: fix dropping packets with Ethertype 0x88A8
>
> Refer to FW default setting, Ethertype 0x88A8 is treated as S-TAG,
17 matches
Mail list logo
