> > >>> What is not clear to me is motivation to use weak here instead of simply
> > using >CONFIG_RTE_I40E_INC_VECTOR
> > >>> macro to exclude stubs in i40e_rxtx.c. It will make library smaller and
> > >>> avoid
> > issues like this one
> > >>> which are quite hard to troubleshoot.
> > >> Since
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy [mailto:sergio.gonzalez.monroy at intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 1:05 PM
> To: Elo, Matias (Nokia - FI/Espoo) ;
> dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: ferruh.yigit at intel.com; damarion at cisco.com
> Subject: Re: [dpd
>> What is not clear to me is motivation to use weak here instead of simply
>> using >CONFIG_RTE_I40E_INC_VECTOR
>> macro to exclude stubs in i40e_rxtx.c. It will make library smaller and
>> avoid issues like this one
>> which are quite hard to troubleshoot.
>
>Since this issue seen in fd.io, I
> >>> What is not clear to me is motivation to use weak here instead of simply
> using >CONFIG_RTE_I40E_INC_VECTOR
> >>> macro to exclude stubs in i40e_rxtx.c. It will make library smaller and
> >>> avoid
> issues like this one
> >>> which are quite hard to troubleshoot.
> >> Since this issue
4 matches
Mail list logo