[dpdk-dev] Polling too often at lower packet rates?

> > > http://video.fosdem.org/2015/devroom-network_management_and_sdn/ > <http://video.fosdem.org/2015/devroom-network_management_and_sdn/> > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Aaron Campbell <mailto:aaron at arbor.net>> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a machine

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: add option --master-lcore

Acked-by: Aaron Campbell mailto:aaron at arbor.net>> Minor comments inline below, I don?t need to see another patch. Thanks, -Aaron > On Nov 4, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > > + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "please spec

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/linuxapp: Add parameter to specify master lcore id

> On Nov 4, 2014, at 3:00 PM, Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > > 2014-11-03 13:02, Aaron Campbell: >>> On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:28 AM, Simon Kuenzer >>> wrote: >>> >>> + else if (!strcmp(

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/linuxapp: Add parameter to specify master lcore id

Hi Simon, Thanks for the patch, this will be useful for us. I responded separately to your original post with one suggestion. Our application currently assumes that DPDK will assign the first bit set in the coremask to the master lcore. As far as I can tell, this is hard-coded as of 1.7.1.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/linuxapp: Add parameter to specify master lcore id

> On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:28 AM, Simon Kuenzer wrote: > > + else if (!strcmp(lgopts[option_index].name, > OPT_MASTER_LCORE)) { > + if (!coremask_ok) { > + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "please specify the > master " > +

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] stringfns: remove rte_snprintf

On Jun 26, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Richardson, Bruce wrote: >> I agree we should try to use the "deprecated" attribute when possible. >> So application porting effort will be smoother. >> >> But in this case, there is something different: as Stephen wrote, >> rte_snprintf >> is useless. It's

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix invalid memory read as reported by valgrind

already been freed. So move the closedir() call lower. Signed-off-by: Aaron Campbell --- lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_lcore.c | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_lcore.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_lcore.c index

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: clear errno before calling strtoull() to parse base_virtaddr

hat Pablo De Lara has beat you to it by a few minutes :-) Are there > any other places this could potentially happen? > >> Must reset errno to zero before calling strtoull(), else on success it could >> be >> any arbitrary value from past errors. >> >>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: clear errno before calling strtoull() to parse base_virtaddr

Must reset errno to zero before calling strtoull(), else on success it could be any arbitrary value from past errors. Signed-off-by: Aaron Campbell --- lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal