Hello Ben,
On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:37 AM, Ben Walker wrote:
> Instead of passing domain, bus, devid, func, just pass
> an rte_pci_addr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Walker
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 32 +---
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+),
On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:37 AM, Ben Walker wrote:
> Two functions is both confusing and unnecessary. Previously,
> rte_eal_pci_scan populated an internal list of devices by
> scanning sysfs. Then, rte_eal_pci_probe would match registered
> drivers to that internal list. These are not really
Hi Ben,
On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:37 AM, Ben Walker wrote:
> rte_eal_pci_scan can be called repeatedly to re-scan the PCI
> bus. If a device was removed from the system, the associated
> driver will automatically be unloaded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Walker
> ---
[...]
While reviewing, I
>d_name, sizeof(e->d_name), )
> != 0)
> continue;
>
> snprintf(dirname, sizeof(dirname), "%s/%s",
> pci_get_sysfs_path(), e->d_name);
> - if (pci_scan_one(dirname, domain, bus, devid, function) < 0)
> + if (pci_scan_one(dirname, ) < 0)
> goto error;
> }
> closedir(dir);
> +
> return 0;
>
> error:
>
This is much more cleaner than passing all the BDF entries.
Except the above unnecessary new line:
Acked-by: Shreyansh Jain
On Thursday 24 November 2016 01:37 AM, Ben Walker wrote:
> Attaching and detaching ethernet ports from an application
> is not the same thing as physically removing a PCI device,
> so clarify the flags indicating support. All PCI devices
> are assumed to be physically removable, so no flag is
>
> + if (ret) {
> dev->driver = NULL;
> + if (dr->drv_flags & RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING)
> + rte_eal_pci_unmap_device(dev);
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
>
Acked-by: Shreyansh Jain
I should have replied to this earlier, apologies.
On Sunday 20 November 2016 09:00 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
>> design of device tree (or
On Monday 21 November 2016 10:25 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> The drivers should not directly access the rte_eth_dev->pci_dev but use
> a macro instead. This is a preparation for replacing the pci_dev with
> a struct rte_device member in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck
> ---
>
On Monday 21 November 2016 10:25 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> This macro is based on Jan Viktorin's original patch but also checks the
> type of the passed pointer against the type of the member.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
> [jblunck at infra
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 07:30 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:57:15AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> +Thomas
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:25:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Viktorin [mailto:viktorin at rehivetech.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 6:03 PM
> To: Shreyansh Jain
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Jan Blunck
> ; dev at dpdk.org; david.marchand at 6wind.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATC
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:50 PM
> To: Shreyansh Jain ; Jan Blunck
>
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; david.marchand at 6wind.com; Jan Viktorin
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [P
On Sunday 20 November 2016 01:30 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> Some platform like octeontx may use pci and
> vdev based combined device to represent a logical
> dpdk functional device.In such case, postponing the
> vdev initialization after pci device
> initialization will provide the better view of
>
sorry for delay in responding; somehow I didn't notice this email.
On Thursday 17 November 2016 06:23 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> This patch demonstrates how eth_driver can be replaced with appropriate
>> changes for r
On Thursday 17 November 2016 05:25 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
>> design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A non-PCI
>
On Thursday 17 November 2016 05:36 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> From: Jan Viktorin
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
>> Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
>> ---
>> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_c
Hello Jan,
Thanks for comments. Replies inline.
On Thursday 17 November 2016 04:49 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> A device is connected to a bus and services by a driver associated with
>> the bus. It is responsibility of t
d to extraction relvant xxx type,
container_of would have to be used.
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 49 +---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c| 36 +
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h| 6
all the operations for a PCI device, whether binding to a driver
or mmap, be moved to PCI bus code base? All of that is not relevant for
a bus, but then having multiple implementation areas for a common
sub-system (PCI, here) is also not a nice thing.
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
,
for example when added a new device (hotplugging). At present
rte_driver has the probe hook. This should be wrapped around some API
at the bus level so that bus can search through multiple drivers
associated with it for calling probe.
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/common
- no work on this
has been done yet.
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
bus/Makefile | 36
bus/pci/Makefile | 37
bus/pci/linuxapp/pci_bus.c | 418 +
bus/pci/linuxapp/pci_bus.h | 55 ++
4 files changed, 546
bus ||
| | |+-+|
/ / +---+
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h | 243
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h | 36 ++---
2 files chan
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h
b/lib/librte_eal/
rt of 17.02 roadmap.
[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-November/050186.html
Jan Viktorin (1):
eal: define container macro
Shreyansh Jain (5):
eal: introduce bus-device-driver structure
bus: add bus driver layer
eal/common: handle bus abstraction for device/driver objects
eal: suppor
On Monday 14 November 2016 11:08 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
[...]
> What I was thinking is:
>
> rte_device/driver are not abstract classes.
>
> rte_bus device/driver is an abstract class and any bus inherited from
> this class.
> rte_func device/driver is and abstract class and eth/crypto inherited
>
Hello Ferruh,
(Please ignore if line wrappings are not correct. Using a possibly
unconfigured mail client).
> -Original Message-
> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit at intel.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 12:46 AM
> To: Shreyansh Jain ; David Marchand
vice naming functions have been generalized from ethdev and cryptodev
> to EAL. ``rte_eal_pci_device_name`` has been introduced for obtaining
> unique device name from PCI Domain-BDF description.
If it is possible to have a Reviewed-by for a particular part of a patch:
Reviewed-by: Shreyansh Jain
Hello Ferruh,
Trivial comment/suggestion:
On Thursday 10 November 2016 10:57 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> DPDK switched to main and sub-repositories approach, this patch
> documents new approach and updates development process according.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit
> ---
>
On Thursday 10 November 2016 02:56 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-11-10 14:40, Shreyansh Jain:
>> On Thursday 10 November 2016 01:11 PM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
>>> On 10 November 2016 at 14:10, Shreyansh Jain
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 10 November 2016 09:0
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index 1a9e1ae..2af2476 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc
Hello David,
On Thursday 10 November 2016 01:46 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> Hello Shreyansh,
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> I need some help and clarification regarding some changes I am doing to
>> cleanup the EAL code.
>>
>>
On Thursday 10 November 2016 01:11 PM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 10 November 2016 at 14:10, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> On Thursday 10 November 2016 09:00 AM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28 October 2016 at 20:26, Shreyansh Jain
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Thursday 10 November 2016 01:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-11-10 15:51, Jianbo Liu:
>> On 10 November 2016 at 15:26, Shreyansh Jain
>> wrote:
>>> This is what the current outline of eth_driver is:
>>>
>>> +
On Thursday 10 November 2016 01:21 PM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 10 November 2016 at 15:26, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> Hello David, list,
>>
>> I need some help and clarification regarding some changes I am doing to
>> cleanup the EAL code.
>>
>> T
Hello David, list,
I need some help and clarification regarding some changes I am doing to
cleanup the EAL code.
There are some changes which should be done for
eth_driver/rte_eth_device structures:
1. most obvious, eth_driver should be renamed to rte_eth_driver.
2. eth_driver currently has
On Thursday 10 November 2016 09:00 AM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 28 October 2016 at 20:26, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>> Each SoC PMD registers a set of callback for scanning its own bus/infra and
>> matching devices to drivers when probe is called.
>> This patch introduces the i
On Thursday 10 November 2016 08:36 AM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 28 October 2016 at 20:26, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>> From: Jan Viktorin
>>
>> SoC devices would be linked in a separate list (from PCI). This is used for
>> probe function.
>> A helper for dumping the d
On Thursday 10 November 2016 09:39 AM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 28 October 2016 at 20:26, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>> From: Jan Viktorin
>>
>> Define initial structures and functions for the SoC infrastructure.
>> This patch supports only a very minimal function
Hello Jianbo,
Thanks a lot for your time in commenting this. My comments inline (as
well as on other similar mails).
On Thursday 10 November 2016 07:54 AM, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> On 28 October 2016 at 20:26, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>> From: Jan Viktorin
>>
>> Genera
u have given
offline/IRC etc.)
I was beginning to wonder that probably only Jan and me were the ones
interested in this. Ironically, I felt that being EAL changes, a lot of
people would come and be critic of it - giving an opportunity to get it
widely accepted.
>
> 2016-10-28 17:
On 10/26/2016 3:20 AM, Ben Walker wrote:
> If the user asks to probe multiple times, the probe
> callback should only be called on devices that don't have
> a driver already loaded.
>
> This is useful if a driver is registered after the
> execution of a program has started and the list of devices
Hello Ben,
Apologies for joining this discussion late.
On 10/24/2016 11:46 PM, Walker, Benjamin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Ben Walker and I'm the technical lead for SPDK (it's like DPDK, but
> for storage devices). SPDK relies on DPDK only for the base functionality in
> the
> EAL - memory
On Friday 28 October 2016 05:56 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Introduction:
> =
>
> This patch set is direct derivative of Jan's original series [1],[2].
>
> - This version is based on master HEAD (ca41215)
>
> - In this, I am merging the series [11] bac
- rte_cryptodev_driver/rte_cryptodev_dev embeds rte_soc_driver/device for
linking SoC PMDs to crypto devices.
- Add probe and remove functions linked
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 122
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 148 +-
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 31 +
2 files change
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
We abstract access to the intr_handle here as we want to get
it either from the pci_dev or soc_dev.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 14 +++
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Now that different types of ethdev exist, check for presence of PCI dev
while copying out the info.
Similar would be done for SoC.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
It is not necessary to place the rte_pci_driver at the beginning
of the rte_eth_dev struct anymore as we use the container_of macro
to get the parent pointer.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant A
lready registered
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
[Shreyansh: merge multiple patches into single set]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_soc.c | 30
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h | 23 ++
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h | 28 ++
ed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
[Shreyansh: restructure commit to be an optional implementation]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
v5:
- Update rte_eal_soc_scan to rte_eal_soc_scan_platform_bus
- Fix comments over scan and match functions
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h | 16 +-
lib/libr
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h
b/lib/libr
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
The flags are copied from the PCI ones. They should be refactorized into a
general set of flags in the future.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
It is assumed that SoC Devices provided on command line are prefixed with
"soc:". This patch adds parse and attach support for such devices.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
--
v4:
- Update test_soc for descriptive test function names
- Comments over test functions
- devinit and devuninint --> probe/remove
- RTE_VERIFY at some places
---
app/test/test_so
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile| 1 +
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 4 +++
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_soc.c
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Support --enable-soc. SoC support is disabled by default.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
[Shreyansh: Change --no-soc to --enable-soc; disabled by default]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
doc/guides/testpmd_
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
SoC devices would be linked in a separate list (from PCI). This is used for
probe function.
A helper for dumping the device list is added.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/libr
ed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
[Shreyansh: update PMD registration method]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
app/test/test_soc.c | 111
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map | 3 +
lib/librte_eal/
device/rte_soc_driver.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
app/test/Makefile | 1 +
app/test/test_soc.c | 90 +
lib/librte_eal/common/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/librte_eal/
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h
b/lib/librte_eal/
ed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 7 +++
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h | 14 ++
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 29 +
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 31 +--
4 files chang
tation updated as ENOTSUP
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
Changes since v2:
- update BSD support for unbind kernel driver
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 7 +++
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 4 ++--
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
The functions pci_map_resource, pci_unmap_resource are generic so the
pci_* prefix can be omitted. The functions are moved to the
eal_common_dev.c so they can be reused by other infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shr
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
Changes since v0:
- fix compilation error due to missing include
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h | 12
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h | 9 --
a PCI device
ether: extract function eth_dev_get_intr_handle
ether: introduce ethernet dev probe remove
Shreyansh Jain (2):
eal/soc: implement probing of drivers
eal/crypto: Support rte_soc_driver/device for cryptodev
app/test/Makefile | 1 +
app/test/test_
- rte_cryptodev_driver/rte_cryptodev_dev embeds rte_soc_driver/device for
linking SoC PMDs to crypto devices.
- Add probe and remove functions linked
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 122
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 148 +-
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 31 +
2 files change
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
We abstract access to the intr_handle here as we want to get
it either from the pci_dev or soc_dev.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 14 +++
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Now that different types of ethdev exist, check for presence of PCI dev
while copying out the info.
Similar would be done for SoC.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
It is not necessary to place the rte_pci_driver at the beginning
of the rte_eth_dev struct anymore as we use the container_of macro
to get the parent pointer.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant A
lready registered
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
[Shreyansh: merge multiple patches into single set]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_soc.c | 30
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h | 23 ++
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h | 28 ++
ed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
[Shreyansh: restructure commit to be an optional implementation]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
v5:
- Update rte_eal_soc_scan to rte_eal_soc_scan_platform_bus
- Fix comments over scan and match functions
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h | 16 +-
lib/libr
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.h
b/lib/libr
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
The flags are copied from the PCI ones. They should be refactorized into a
general set of flags in the future.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_soc.
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
It is assumed that SoC Devices provided on command line are prefixed with
"soc:". This patch adds parse and attach support for such devices.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile| 1 +
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 4 +++
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_soc.c
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Support --enable-soc. SoC support is disabled by default.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
[Shreyansh: Change --no-soc to --enable-soc; disabled by default]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
doc/guides/testpmd_
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
SoC devices would be linked in a separate list (from PCI). This is used for
probe function.
A helper for dumping the device list is added.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
lib/libr
ed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
[Shreyansh: update PMD registration method]
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
app/test/test_soc.c | 111
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map | 3 +
lib/librte_eal/
device/rte_soc_driver.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal
---
app/test/Makefile | 1 +
app/test/test_soc.c | 90 +
lib/librte_eal/common/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/librte_eal/
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h
b/lib/librte_eal/
ed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 7 +++
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h | 14 ++
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 29 +
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 31 +--
4 files chang
tation updated as ENOTSUP
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
Changes since v2:
- update BSD support for unbind kernel driver
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 7 +++
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 4 ++--
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_private.h
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
The functions pci_map_resource, pci_unmap_resource are generic so the
pci_* prefix can be omitted. The functions are moved to the
eal_common_dev.c so they can be reused by other infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shr
From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@rehivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Viktorin
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
Changes since v0:
- fix compilation error due to missing include
---
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_dev.h | 12
lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h | 9 --
e
ether: introduce ethernet dev probe remove
Shreyansh Jain (2):
eal/soc: implement probing of drivers
eal/crypto: Support rte_soc_driver/device for cryptodev
app/test/Makefile | 1 +
app/test/test_soc.c | 404 +++
On Thursday 27 October 2016 04:59 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> index aa0c09a..db20567 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst
> @@ -201,6 +201,32 @@ API Changes
> * The ``file_name`` data type of ``struct rte_por
_device_name API
|- moved device naming to EAL
Also, deprecation notice from 16.07 has been removed and release notes for
16.11 added.
[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-September/047087.html
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
v4:
- fix spelling mistakes and incorrect symbol name in doc
Hello Thomas,
On Thursday 27 October 2016 03:45 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-10-27 12:38, Shreyansh Jain:
>> rte_device/driver generalization patches [1] were merged without a change
>> in the LIBABIVER macro. This patches bumps the macro of affected libs.
>
&
s been removed and release notes for
16.11 added.
[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-September/047087.html
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
v3:
- add API/ABI change info in commit log
- fix library version change notification in release note
- fix erroneous change to librte_eal version
On Wednesday 26 October 2016 08:53 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-10-26 15:25, Ferruh Yigit:
>> eal version seems already increased for this release, 2 => 3, in:
>> d7e61ad3ae36 ("log: remove deprecated history dump")
>
> Yes thanks.
>
>> So NO need to increase it again, sorry for late notice,
Hello Ferruh,
On Wednesday 26 October 2016 07:55 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> Hi Shreyansh,
>
> On 10/26/2016 2:12 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>> On Wednesday 26 October 2016 06:30 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>> rte_device/driver generalization patches [1] were
On Wednesday 26 October 2016 06:30 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> rte_device/driver generalization patches [1] were merged without a change
> in the LIBABIVER macro. This patches bumps the macro of affected libs.
>
> Also, deprecation notice from 16.07 has been removed and release notes
On Wednesday 26 October 2016 06:08 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> rte_device/driver generalization patches [1] were merged without a change
> in the LIBABIVER macro. This patches bumps the macro of affected libs.
>
> Also, deprecation notice from 16.07 has been removed and release notes
rte_device/driver generalization patches [1] were merged without a change
in the LIBABIVER macro. This patches bumps the macro of affected libs.
Also, deprecation notice from 16.07 has been removed and release notes for
16.11 added.
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
--
v2:
- Mark bumped libraries
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 12
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst | 16
lib/librte_cryptodev/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile | 2
Hello Reshma,
On Tuesday 25 October 2016 09:19 PM, Pattan, Reshma wrote:
> Hi Shreyansh,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Shreyansh Jain
>> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 5:30 AM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>
On Tuesday 25 October 2016 11:06 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Hello Jan,
>
> On Monday 24 October 2016 09:51 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:29:25 +0530
>> Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>
>>> From: Jan Viktorin
>>>
>>> Define initi
On Monday 24 October 2016 09:55 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 24, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Morten Br?rup
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> First of all: Thanks for a great DPDK Userspace 2016!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Continuing the Userspace
Hello Jan,
On Monday 24 October 2016 09:51 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:29:25 +0530
> Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>
>> From: Jan Viktorin
>>
>> Define initial structures and functions for the SoC infrastructure.
>> This patch supports only a very m
1 - 100 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
