On 30/10/15 9:43 pm, "David Marchand" wrote:
>From: Julien Meunier
>
>Report an error when something went wrong.
>
>Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier
>Signed-off-by: David Marchand
>---
> drivers/net/enic/enic_ethdev.c | 7 ---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git
On 11/09/15 1:32 pm, "David Marchand" wrote:
>If dpdk is run with memory only available on socket != 0, then hash
>creation will fail and flow director feature won't be available.
>Fix this by asking for allocation on caller socket.
>
>Signed-off-by: David Marchand
>---
>
On 11/09/15 1:32 pm, "David Marchand" wrote:
>Seen by code review.
>
>If dpdk is run with memory only available on socket != 0, then enic pmd
>refuses to initialize ports as this pmd requires some memory on socket 0.
>Fix this by setting socket to SOCKET_ID_ANY, so that allocations happen on
On 04/09/15 2:35 pm, "Pablo de Lara"
wrote:
>RTE_HASH_KEY_LENGTH_MAX was deprecated, and the hash table
>actually is hosting bigger keys than that size, so key length
>has been increased to properly allocate all keys.
>
>Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara
>---
> drivers/net/enic/enic_clsf.c | 4 ++--
Stephen,
The enic debug flag is off by default. So it is going to print the
version only if the user wants it to.
Isn?t that fine?
Thanks,
-Sujith
From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
Date: Wednesday, 20 May 2015 11:17 pm
To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)"
Cc:
On 20/05/15 9:44 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>2015-05-20 16:04, Richardson, Bruce:
>> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>> > 2015-05-15 16:56, Bruce Richardson:
>> > > move enic PMD to drivers/net directory
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson
>> > > ---
>>
On 19/05/15 3:38 pm, "Bruce Richardson" wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:37:49AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> From: Stephen Hemminger
>>
>> Silence is normal. drivers should speak only when spoken to and not
>> be chatty.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger
>
>Acked-by: Bruce
On 06/05/15 9:19 pm, "Bruce Richardson" wrote:
>On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 02:41:00PM +0530, Sujith Sankar wrote:
>> This patch adds the changes required to build enic for FreeBSD
>>
>
>Hi,
>
>I see no issues with this patch, but I suggest the description for it
>should
>be changed. There is no
On 07/04/15 11:10 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>The function name is printed in each enic_ethdev function.
>Disable it by default with a new build option.
>
>Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
>---
> config/common_bsdapp | 1 +
> config/common_linuxapp| 1 +
>
On 27/02/15 4:16 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>2015-02-27 08:09, Sujith Sankar:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> No update on it from my side :-(
>> It would take some more time for me to start working on it (and flow
>> director api) as a few other things are keeping me busy.
>
>It's unfortunate.
>We now
Stephen,
Saw your patch. Will take a look.
Thanks,
-Sujith
On 15/02/15 11:43 am, "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" wrote:
>Hi Stephen, David,
>
>I agree with you and shall submit this change.
>
>Thanks,
>-Sujith
>
>On 09/02/15 9:41 pm, "Stephen Hemminger"
Hi Stephen, David,
I agree with you and shall submit this change.
Thanks,
-Sujith
On 09/02/15 9:41 pm, "Stephen Hemminger"
wrote:
>Agree it should not use printf.
>If you insist on keeping the useless message then it should be log level
>debug
pktgen-dpdk as I was stuck on it.
Thanks,
-Sujith
From: David Marchand mailto:david.march...@6wind.com>>
Date: Tuesday, 20 January 2015 4:55 pm
To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" mailto:ssujith at
cisco.com>>
Cc: "dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>" mailto:
On 29/12/14 1:45 pm, "Wu, Jingjing" wrote:
>Hi, ssujith
>
>> +.tx_queue_release = enicpmd_dev_tx_queue_release,
>> +.dev_led_on = NULL,
>> +.dev_led_off = NULL,
>> +.flow_ctrl_get= NULL,
>> +.flow_ctrl_set= NULL,
>> +
On 16/12/14 4:06 pm, "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) [mailto:ssujith at cisco.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 10:34 AM
>> To: Burakov, Anatoly; Thomas Monjalon
>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
On 16/12/14 3:52 pm, "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
>> On 16/12/14 4:54 am, "Thomas Monjalon"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >2014-12-12 13:48, Sujith Sankar:
>> >> This patch corrects the usage of the flag VFIO_PRESENT in enic
>>driver.
>> >
>> >Please, could you explain why the flag VFIO_PRESENT was not well
On 16/12/14 1:21 pm, "Qiu, Michael" wrote:
>On 12/16/2014 12:13 PM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith) wrote:
>> On 16/12/14 4:54 am, "Thomas Monjalon"
>>wrote:
>>
>>> 2014-12-12 13:48, Sujith Sankar:
>>>> This patch corrects the usage
On 02/12/14 8:29 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>A lot of warnings were not seen because $(WERROR_FLAGS) was not set
>in the Makefile. But they appear with toolchains that enforce more checks.
>
>-Wno-deprecated seems useless.
>-Wno-strict-aliasing is added to avoid false positives.
>
>This
On 01/12/14 4:27 pm, "Bruce Richardson" wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:47:37PM +0530, Sujith Sankar wrote:
>> This patch fixes the warnings and error reported by clang compiler on
>>Linux.
>>
>> Reported-by: Bruce Richardson
>> Signed-off-by: Sujith Sankar
>
>This PMD now compiles up
On 29/11/14 4:47 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>29/11/2014 07:22, Sujith Sankar :
>> Sorry for the typo in the subject. It is enicpmd.
>
>Actually no, it should be enic.
Usually we use enic to denote the kernel mode driver and enicpmd to denote
the PMD.
But it is alright to follow what?s being
On 28/11/14 9:36 pm, "Bruce Richardson" wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 04:01:00PM +, Sujith Sankar (ssujith) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28/11/14 9:22 pm, "Bruce Richardson"
>>wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:08:19PM +05
On 28/11/14 9:22 pm, "Bruce Richardson" wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:08:19PM +0530, Sujith Sankar wrote:
>> ENIC PMD was giving compilation errors on ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc
>>because
>> of types such as u_int32_t. This patch replaces all those with
>>uint32_t and
>> similar ones.
>>
On 28/11/14 1:54 am, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>2014-11-27 19:01, Thomas Monjalon:
>> 2014-11-27 22:44, Sujith Sankar:
>> > Inclusion of vfio.h was giving compilation errors if kernel version
>>is less
>> > than 3.6.0 and if RTE_EAL_VFIO was on in config.
>> >
>> > Replaced inclusion of vfio.h
On 27/11/14 10:44 pm, "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" wrote:
>Inclusion of vfio.h was giving compilation errors if kernel version is
>less
>than 3.6.0 and if RTE_EAL_VFIO was on in config.
>
>Replaced inclusion of vfio.h with eal_vfio.h and replaced RTE_EAL_VFIO
>with
&
Marchand mailto:david.march...@6wind.com>>
Date: Thursday, 27 November 2014 5:14 pm
To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" mailto:ssujith at
cisco.com>>
Cc: Chao Zhu mailto:chaozhu at
linux.vnet.ibm.com>>, "dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>" mailto:d
Thanks Thomas, David and Neil !
I shall work on finishing the documentation.
About that, you had mentioned that you wanted it in doc/drivers/ path.
Could I send a patch with documentation in the path doc/drivers/enicpmd/ ?
Thanks,
-Sujith
On 27/11/14 3:41 am, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>> >
Thanks David.
I shall rectify those.
Regards,
-Sujith
From: David Marchand mailto:david.march...@6wind.com>>
Date: Tuesday, 25 November 2014 8:58 pm
To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" mailto:ssujith at
cisco.com>>
Cc: "dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>"
On 24/11/14 5:47 am, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:38:19PM +0530, Sujith Sankar wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Sujith Sankar
>> ---
>> config/common_linuxapp | 5 +
>> lib/Makefile | 1 +
>>
Thanks for the comments, Neil. I shall include those in v3.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 21/11/14 6:54 pm, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:03:02PM +0530, Sujith Sankar wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Sujith Sankar
>> ---
>> lib/librte_pmd_enic/enic_etherdev.c | 620
On 21/11/14 5:03 pm, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:02:59PM +0530, Sujith Sankar wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Sujith Sankar
>> ---
>> lib/librte_pmd_enic/Makefile | 67
>>
>> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644
Hi David,
Since the kernel version is less than 3.6.0, support for VFIO is not there.
Could you please turn off VFIO in config/common_linuxapp and try with IGB_UIO?
Thanks,
-Sujith
From: David Marchand mailto:david.march...@6wind.com>>
Date: Friday, 21 November 2014 3:22 pm
To: "Su
Thanks for the clear response. I?ll take a look at it.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 10/11/14 3:33 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>2014-11-10 09:27, Sujith Sankar:
>> On 07/11/14 9:17 pm, "Thomas Monjalon"
>>wrote:
>> >It seems that this PMD is based on DPDK 1.7.
>> >Could you rebase it on HEAD?
>>
>>
Neil,
If I move the DPDK patch that accommodates ENIC PMD (that is the one that
patches lib/Makefile) to the last in the series, builds between commits
would succeed, wouldn?t it? Moving that to the last is anyway needed.
Thanks,
-Sujith
On 07/11/14 9:16 pm, "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)&qu
Thomas,
It is our pleasure to be part of the community and to be contributing to
it.
Looking forward to a healthy and fruitful association.
Thanks and Regards,
-Sujith
On 07/11/14 4:39 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>2014-11-08 01:35, Sujith Sankar:
>> ENIC PMD is the poll-mode driver for the
Thomas,
This patch is based on 1.7.1. Thought that is the latest. And I got the
diff from origin.
What made you feel that the patch is from 1.7?
Regards,
-Sujith
On 07/11/14 9:17 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>Sujith,
>
>It seems that this PMD is based on DPDK 1.7.
>Could you rebase it on
Thomas,
Let me work on that too.
Thanks,
-Sujith
On 07/11/14 9:17 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>Sujith,
>
>It seems that this PMD is based on DPDK 1.7.
>Could you rebase it on HEAD?
>
>Thank you
>--
>Thomas
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for the comments.
I?ll work on moving the release notes to rst and add performance numbers
with testpmd. Once I fix these and Neil?s comments, I shall get back with
version 2.
Thanks,
-Sujith
On 07/11/14 5:50 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote:
>Many informations in the release
Hi Neil,
Thanks for the comments. I shall work on the modifications that you have
suggested and get back with V2.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 07/11/14 5:04 pm, "Neil Horman" wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 01:35:43AM +0530, Sujith Sankar wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Sujith Sankar
>> ---
>>
h the steps,
>although they are basically the same as for VFIO.
>
>Thanks,
>Anatoly
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) [mailto:ssujith at cisco.com]
>Sent: Monday, September 8, 2014 9:28 AM
>To: Burakov, Anatoly; Stephen Hemminger
>Cc: dev at
ot; wrote:
>Hi Sujith
>
>Not that I know of, no. There are other ways to run physical NICs in a VM
>though, you don't require VFIO for that.
>
>Thanks,
>Anatoly
>
>-----Original Message-
>From: Sujith Sankar (ssujith) [mailto:ssujith at cisco.com]
>Sent: Mon
Hi Anatoly,
Has anything happened in this front? Do you see running of DPDK in guest
OS on KVM with physical NIC passed through to it happening soon?
Thanks,
-Sujith
On 02/05/14 2:28 pm, "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
>Hi Stephen,
>
>> Will this work in guest? or only on bare metal?
>
>VFIO is
Hi Hobywan,
We?re still working on benchmarking, and would share the numbers once we are
done with it.
Could you please elaborate on vectorisation functions?
Thanks,
-Sujith
From: Hobywan Kenoby mailto:hobyw...@hotmail.com>>
Date: Friday, 11 July 2014 6:46 pm
To: "Sujith Sank
of submitting the patch soon.
Thanks,
-Sujith
From: Hobywan Kenoby mailto:hobyw...@hotmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, 10 July 2014 1:37 am
To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" mailto:ssujith at
cisco.com>>, "dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>" mailto:dev at dpdk.org>&g
Thank you Anatoly !
I?ll take a look at it and get back in case of questions.
-Sujith
On 28/05/14 2:22 pm, "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>> One aspect of ENIC PMD is that it works with VFIO-PCI and not UIO. Hope
>> this is acceptable. The following thread in dpdk-dev influenced
Hi all,
We have been working on development of poll-mode driver for Cisco VIC
Ethernet NIC and integration of it with DPDK. We would like to submit
this poll-mode driver (ENIC PMD) to the DPDK community so that it could be
part of the DPDK tree.
Could someone please provide the guidelines and
Hi,
Could someone kindly give information about the following aspects of the use of
FDIR? It is about adding of flow classification rule using
fdir_add_perfect_filter()
1. For SCTP, what are the mandatory fields to be provided in struct
rte_fdir_filter ? Is it enough if protocol and src
Hi all,
Could someone answer the following questions about the usage of multiple NIC
interfaces with DPDK?
1. If my server has two identical Intel NICs, could I use both with DPDK and
its applications?
2. If both the NIC cards could be used with DPDK, could I use them with
separate
Hi all,
In the documentation available on DPDK, I could find the performance numbers in
terms of packets per second. Could someone point me to some documentation
which gives performance gain of round trip time or packet processing time in
terms of time, say, usecs?
Also, what is the tool
.000.
>[Powering 30 Years of
>Innovation]<http://www.windriver.com/announces/wr30/>
>
>On Sep 17, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Sujith Sankar (ssujith)
>mailto:ssujith at cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>Hi Vincent,
>
>Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful.
>I th
Thank you Gil.
-Sujith
On 17/09/13 6:39 PM, "Gil Hellmann" wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>To add to the respond given by Mr. Jardin, Wind River also has commercial
>grade protocol stack that could be used with DPDK libraries and
>application, it is part of Wind Rivers' INP (Intelligent Networking
Hi Vincent,
Sincere thanks to you for the email ! This is very helpful.
I think I'll go with Rump kernel stack to start with, and might think
about the other options later.
Regards,
-Sujith
On 17/09/13 2:01 AM, "Vincent JARDIN" wrote:
>Hi Sujith,
>
>NetBSD/Rump is the only open source TCP/IP
Hi all,
I'm new to DPDK and this group.
In order to try out some of my applications on DPDK, I'd like to know a
little bit about the options that are there for protocol processing.
Could someone give info about the TCP/IP stacks that could be used with
DPDK libraries and applications? Quick
52 matches
Mail list logo
