[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni:optimization of rte_kni_rx_burst

> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jay Rolette > Sent: 25/Feb/2015 7:00 PM > To: Marc Sune > Cc: DPDK > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni:optimization of rte_kni_rx_burst > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Marc Sune wrote: > > > > > On

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni:optimization of rte_kni_rx_burst

Hi OIivier Comments inline. Regards, Hemant > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier Deme > Sent: 25/Feb/2015 5:44 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni:optimization of rte_kni_rx_burst > > Thank you Hemant,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: create KNI interface in current network namespace

> 2014-11-21 12:10, Takayuki Usui: > > With this patch, KNI interface (e.g. vEth0) is created in the network > > namespace where the DPDK application is running. > > Otherwise, all interfaces are created in the default namespace in the > > host. > > > > Signed-off-by: Takayuki Usui > > --- > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/12] Add cache size define for IBM Power Architecture

> --- a/mk/arch/powerpc/rte.vars.mk > +++ b/mk/arch/powerpc/rte.vars.mk > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ > ARCH ?= powerpc > CROSS ?= > > -CPU_CFLAGS ?= -m64 > +CPU_CFLAGS ?= -m64 -DCACHE_LINE_SIZE=128 [hemant] Instead of hardcoding the CACHE_LINE_SIZE, can you drive the CACHE_LINE_SIZE from config

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/12] Add atomic operations for IBM Power architecture

Hi Chao, This Patch seems to be incomplete. You may also need to patch the librte_eal\common\include\rte_atomic.h e.g. #if !(defined RTE_ARCH_X86_64) || !(defined RTE_ARCH_I686) #include #else /* if Intel*/ Otherwise you shall be getting compilation errors for "_mm_mfence" Similar is true