M
>>>> To: Marc Sune
>>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration
>>>> option
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote:
>>>&
dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin
> >>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration
> >>option
> >>
> >>On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote:
> >>>This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone
> -Original Message-
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:24 PM
> To: Marc Sune
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration
> option
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:
On 10/02/15 14:22, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:21:55PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote:
>> On 10/02/15 13:02, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote:
This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:21:55PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote:
>
> On 10/02/15 13:02, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote:
> >>This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please
> >>give some quick feedback?
> >>
> >>Thanks
>
On 10/02/15 13:02, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote:
>> This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please
>> give some quick feedback?
>>
>> Thanks
>> marc
>>
> Idea is good, any chance it could be added as a run-time
This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone
please give some quick feedback?
Thanks
marc
On 07/11/14 12:00, Marc Sune wrote:
> This patch introduces CONFIG_RTE_KNI_PREEMPT flag. When set to 'no', KNI
> kernel thread(s) do not call schedule_timeout_interruptible(), which
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote:
> This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please
> give some quick feedback?
>
> Thanks
> marc
>
Idea is good, any chance it could be added as a run-time rather than
compile-time option?
/Bruce
> On 07/11/14
This patch introduces CONFIG_RTE_KNI_PREEMPT flag. When set to 'no', KNI
kernel thread(s) do not call schedule_timeout_interruptible(), which improves
overall KNI performance at the expense of CPU cycles (polling).
Default values is 'yes', maintaining the same behaviour as of now.
Signed-off-by:
9 matches
Mail list logo