[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2015-02-12 Thread Marc Sune
M >>>> To: Marc Sune >>>> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin >>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration >>>> option >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: >>>&

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2015-02-11 Thread Bruce Richardson
dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin > >>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration > >>option > >> > >>On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: > >>>This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2015-02-11 Thread Zhang, Helin
> -Original Message- > From: Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:24 PM > To: Marc Sune > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration > option > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2015-02-10 Thread Marc Sune
On 10/02/15 14:22, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:21:55PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: >> On 10/02/15 13:02, Bruce Richardson wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2015-02-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:21:55PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: > > On 10/02/15 13:02, Bruce Richardson wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: > >>This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please > >>give some quick feedback? > >> > >>Thanks >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2015-02-10 Thread Marc Sune
On 10/02/15 13:02, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: >> This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please >> give some quick feedback? >> >> Thanks >> marc >> > Idea is good, any chance it could be added as a run-time

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2015-02-10 Thread Marc Sune
This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please give some quick feedback? Thanks marc On 07/11/14 12:00, Marc Sune wrote: > This patch introduces CONFIG_RTE_KNI_PREEMPT flag. When set to 'no', KNI > kernel thread(s) do not call schedule_timeout_interruptible(), which

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2015-02-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Marc Sune wrote: > This patch of Nov 2014 hasn't been yet ACKed/NACKed. Could someone please > give some quick feedback? > > Thanks > marc > Idea is good, any chance it could be added as a run-time rather than compile-time option? /Bruce > On 07/11/14

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Adding RTE_KNI_PREEMPT configuration option

2014-11-07 Thread Marc Sune
This patch introduces CONFIG_RTE_KNI_PREEMPT flag. When set to 'no', KNI kernel thread(s) do not call schedule_timeout_interruptible(), which improves overall KNI performance at the expense of CPU cycles (polling). Default values is 'yes', maintaining the same behaviour as of now. Signed-off-by: