[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

2016-11-11 Thread Tan, Jianfeng
Hi Thomas and Konrad, On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon > wrote: >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to >>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

2016-11-10 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: >> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to >> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the >> maintainer of all xen-related files. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

2016-11-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: > As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to > continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the > maintainer of all xen-related files. > > Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan Applied Please Jianfeng, could you start your new role by

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

2016-11-07 Thread Jianfeng Tan
As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the maintainer of all xen-related files. Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index