On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:14:26PM +0100, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Sorry about this. I sent a v2 for this patch but not in the same thread:
>
> http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-April/037996.html
>
Ok, I see it in patchwork now, thanks.
When sending a v2, please keep the
Hi Bruce,
Sorry about this. I sent a v2 for this patch but not in the same thread:
http://www.dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-April/037996.html
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Richardson <
bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:14:15PM +0100, Alejandro Lucero
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:14:15PM +0100, Alejandro Lucero wrote:
> Some apps calling some functions from different threads at the
> same time could lead to reconfig problems. Reconfig mechanism is
> based on a hardware queue where incrementing a counter signals the
> firmware to do the reconfig.
Some apps calling some functions from different threads at the
same time could lead to reconfig problems. Reconfig mechanism is
based on a hardware queue where incrementing a counter signals the
firmware to do the reconfig. If there are two increments before the
first one has been processed the
4 matches
Mail list logo