Hi Vadim,
On 03/07/2015 12:24 AM, Vadim Suraev wrote:
> Hi, Olivier,
> I realized that if local cache for the mempool is enabled and greater
> than 0,
> if, say, the mempool size is X and local cache length is Y (and it is
> not empty,Y>0)
> an attempt to allocate a bulk, whose size is greater tha
Hi, Olivier,
I realized that if local cache for the mempool is enabled and greater than
0,
if, say, the mempool size is X and local cache length is Y (and it is not
empty,Y>0)
an attempt to allocate a bulk, whose size is greater than local cache size
(max) and greater than X-Y (which is the number
Hi Vadim,
On 02/27/2015 06:09 PM, Vadim Suraev wrote:
> >Indeed, this function looks useful, and I also have a work in progress
> >on this topic, but currently it is not well tested.
> I'm sorry, I didn't know. I'll not interfere with my patch))
That not what I wanted to say :)
You are very we
Hi, Olivier, Hi Konstantin,
>Indeed, this function looks useful, and I also have a work in progress
>on this topic, but currently it is not well tested.
I'm sorry, I didn't know. I'll not interfere with my patch))
>About the inlining, I have no objection now, although Stephen may be
>right. I thi
Hi Vadim, Hi Konstantin,
On 02/27/2015 01:18 PM, Vadim Suraev wrote:
> Hi, Konstantin,
>
>> Seems really useful.
Indeed, this function looks useful, and I also have a work in progress
on this topic, but currently it is not well tested.
As we are on the mbuf subject, for 2.1, I would like to dis
6, 2015 11:15 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_mbuf: scattered pktmbufs freeing
> optimization
> >
> > From: "vadim.suraev at gmail.com"
> >
> > new function - rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk makes freeing long
> > scat
> From: Vadim Suraev [mailto:vadim.suraev at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:19 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_mbuf: scattered pktmbufs freeing
> optimization
>
> Hi, Konstantin,
> >Seems
Hi Vadim,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of vadim.suraev at
> gmail.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 11:15 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_mbuf: scattered pktmbufs freeing optimization
>
From: "vadim.suraev at gmail.com"
new function - rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk makes freeing long
scattered (chained) pktmbufs belonging to the same pool
more optimal using rte_mempool_put_bulk rather than calling
rte_mempool_put for each segment.
Inlike rte_pktmbuf_free, which calls rte_pktmbuf_free_s
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 01:15:06 +0200
"vadim.suraev at gmail.com" wrote:
> +static inline void __attribute__((always_inline))
> +rte_pktmbuf_free_bulk(struct rte_mbuf *head)
Quit with the inlining. Inlining all the time isn't faster
it just increase the code bloat and causes i-cache misses.
> +{
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
