Hi Anatoly,
2014-04-14 14:39, Burakov, Anatoly:
> > This functionality is at least used by virtio-net-pmd.
> > So we cannot remove this without a fix for virtio-net-pmd.
>
> It appears that virtio-net-pmd hasn't been merged in yet? At least I can't
> see it in the git tree for 1.6 release.
Maybe
Hi Thomas, David,
Thanks for your detailed explanations and insights, I now have a better
picture. I still have to do a lot of catch up on dpdk.org tree and ecosystem,
so please forgive my ignorance about some dpdk.org-related subjects at times :-)
> Do you agree that the David's version is a g
On 04/14/2014 03:12 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
>> For now, I have a problem with your patch as it breaks drivers that use
>> RTE_PCI_DRV_FORCE_UNBIND flag, since it removes the part where this flag
>> is handled. Besides, I can see some remaining parts mentioning
>> pci_switch_module() in comment
Hello Anatoly,
I think we might want to start a discussion on what should be done by the eal
and what should be done by the drivers themselves. But this can be done later.
For now, I have a problem with your patch as it breaks drivers that use
RTE_PCI_DRV_FORCE_UNBIND flag, since it removes the
Hi David,
> This functionality is at least used by virtio-net-pmd.
> So we cannot remove this without a fix for virtio-net-pmd.
It appears that virtio-net-pmd hasn't been merged in yet? At least I can't see
it in the git tree for 1.6 release.
> Yet, even if we remove this from the eal, I think
Hi David,
> For now, I have a problem with your patch as it breaks drivers that use
> RTE_PCI_DRV_FORCE_UNBIND flag, since it removes the part where this flag
> is handled. Besides, I can see some remaining parts mentioning
> pci_switch_module() in comments.
I wonder if this functionality is need
6 matches
Mail list logo
