2016-12-02 14:25, Iremonger, Bernard:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> >
> > Do you agree to copy the remaining VF-specific functions from the generic
> > ethdev API to ixgbe in 17.02?
> > After a deprecation notice, we could remove them from the generic
Hi Thomas,
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 2:16 PM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo ; Iremonger, Bernard
> ; Yigit, Ferruh
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/31] Support VFD and DPD
Do you agree to copy the remaining VF-specific functions from the
generic ethdev API to ixgbe in 17.02?
After a deprecation notice, we could remove them from the generic API in 17.05.
So we will have a consistent status in 17.05 regarding VF functions.
After some time (and experience) we will be a
Hi Bernard,
On 12/02/2016 01:58 PM, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko
Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 9:00 AM
To: Lu, Wenzhuo ; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/31] Support VFD and DPDK PF
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Iremonger, Bernard
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 10:59 AM
> To: Andrew Rybchenko ; Lu, Wenzhuo
> ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/31] Support VFD and DPDK PF + k
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Rybchenko
> Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 9:00 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/31] Support VFD and DPDK PF + kernel VF
> on i40e
>
On 12/02/2016 03:11 AM, Wenzhuo Lu wrote:
1, VF Daemon (VFD)
VFD is an idea to control all the VFs from PF.
As we need to support the scenario kernel PF + DPDK VF, DPDK follows the
interface
between kernel PF + kernel VF. We don't want to introduce too many new messages
between PF and VF. So thi
1, VF Daemon (VFD)
VFD is an idea to control all the VFs from PF.
As we need to support the scenario kernel PF + DPDK VF, DPDK follows the
interface
between kernel PF + kernel VF. We don't want to introduce too many new messages
between PF and VF. So this patch set adds some new APIs to control VF
8 matches
Mail list logo