There is no reason why we should use the "reserve" tailq api, since the pci
entry is already statically reserved.

Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand at 6wind.com>
---
 lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c   |    2 +-
 lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c 
b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c
index e692b35..4d2fbbb 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ rte_eal_pci_init(void)
 {
        TAILQ_INIT(&pci_driver_list);
        TAILQ_INIT(&pci_device_list);
-       uio_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_RESERVE_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, uio_res_list);
+       uio_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_LOOKUP_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI, uio_res_list);

        /* for debug purposes, PCI can be disabled */
        if (internal_config.no_pci)
diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c 
b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c
index 6d4932d..8f44f09 100644
--- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c
+++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_pci.c
@@ -766,8 +766,8 @@ rte_eal_pci_init(void)
 {
        TAILQ_INIT(&pci_driver_list);
        TAILQ_INIT(&pci_device_list);
-       pci_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_RESERVE_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI,
-                       mapped_pci_res_list);
+       pci_res_list = RTE_TAILQ_LOOKUP_BY_IDX(RTE_TAILQ_PCI,
+                                              mapped_pci_res_list);

        /* for debug purposes, PCI can be disabled */
        if (internal_config.no_pci)
-- 
1.7.10.4

Reply via email to