> -Original Message-
> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:aconole at redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 2:49 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo ; Zhang, Helin
> ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Richardson, Bruce
>
> Subject: [PATCH 8/8] drivers/net/ixgbe: Fix uninitialized warning
>
On 10/03/2016 15:03, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 04:45 PM, Remy Horton wrote:
[...]
>> In two minds about this. It is a logical impossibility, but these days
>> optimising compilers are getting very aggressive. For instance GCC has a
>> delightfully-named -fdelete-null-pointer-checks o
On 03/10/2016 04:45 PM, Remy Horton wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2016 13:42, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> On 02/25/2016 08:48 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>> Silence a compiler warning that this variable may be used uninitialized.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole
> [..]
>>
>> The patch looks ok as such, but th
On 02/25/2016 08:48 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Silence a compiler warning that this variable may be used uninitialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole
> ---
> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx
On 10/03/2016 13:42, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/25/2016 08:48 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Silence a compiler warning that this variable may be used uninitialized.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole
[..]
>
> The patch looks ok as such, but then again warning looks like a false
> positive to me:
Silence a compiler warning that this variable may be used uninitialized.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
index e95e6b7..775edc7 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
