Hi Ravi,
2016-02-02 12:01, Kulasek, TomaszX:
> Tested-by: Tomasz Kulasek
> Acked-by: Tomasz Kulasek
I'm sorry that another patch was applied before this one.
Please could you rebase it?
It is too big to do it myself safely.
Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Kerur
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 00:13
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] Modify and modularize l3fwd code
>
> v1:
> > Rebase to latest cod
> From: Ravi Kerur [mailto:rkerur at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 11:13 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce; Doherty, Declan; Ananyev, Konstantin; Ravi Kerur
> Subject: [PATCH v1] Modify and modularize l3fwd code
>
> v1:
> > Rebase to latest code base for DPDK
v1:
> Rebase to latest code base for DPDK team review.
Intel team's (Konstantin, Bruce and Declan) review comments
v4<-v3:
> Fix code review comments from Konstantin
> Move buffer optimization code into l3fwd_lpm_sse.h
and l3fwd_em_sse.h for LPM and EM
Many thanks to Intel team (Konstantin, Bruce and Declan) for below proposal to
make changes to l3fwd code, their valuable inputs during interal review and help
in performance tests.
The main problem with l3fwd is that it is too monolithic with everything being
in one file, and the various options
5 matches
Mail list logo
