2015-12-11 15:54, David Marchand:
> Hello Cunming,
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Cunming Liang
> wrote:
>
> > In eal_intr_proc_rxtx_intr, negative value may be used as argument to a
> > function expecting a positive value. If 'read' returns EAGAIN as example,
> > the bytes_read updates to
Hello Cunming,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Cunming Liang
wrote:
> In eal_intr_proc_rxtx_intr, negative value may be used as argument to a
> function expecting a positive value. If 'read' returns EAGAIN as example,
> the bytes_read updates to a negative value which continue be passed as
> ar
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Cunming Liang
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 1:49 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] eal: fix negative value incorrectly being
> used defect
>
> In eal_intr_
In eal_intr_proc_rxtx_intr, negative value may be used as argument to a
function expecting a positive value. If 'read' returns EAGAIN as example, the
bytes_read updates to a negative value which continue be passed as argument for
the next 'read'.
Coverity issue: 107115
927do {
3. n
4 matches
Mail list logo
