[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: rename unused field to "reserved"

2015-09-22 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:38:45 +0100 Bruce Richardson wrote: > The cuckoo hash has a fixed number of entries per bucket, so the > configuration parameter for this is unused. We change this field in the > parameters struct to "reserved" to indicate that there is now no such > parameter value, while

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: rename unused field to "reserved"

2015-07-15 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Hi Olga, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olga Shern > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 9:08 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: rename unused field to "reserved&

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: rename unused field to "reserved"

2015-07-15 Thread Olga Shern
: Monday, July 13, 2015 7:39 PM To: dev at dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: rename unused field to "reserved" The cuckoo hash has a fixed number of entries per bucket, so the configuration parameter for this is unused. We change this field in the parameters struct to "reserv

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: rename unused field to "reserved"

2015-07-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13 17:38, Bruce Richardson: > The cuckoo hash has a fixed number of entries per bucket, so the > configuration parameter for this is unused. We change this field in the > parameters struct to "reserved" to indicate that there is now no such > parameter value, while at the same time keeping

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: rename unused field to "reserved"

2015-07-13 Thread Bruce Richardson
The cuckoo hash has a fixed number of entries per bucket, so the configuration parameter for this is unused. We change this field in the parameters struct to "reserved" to indicate that there is now no such parameter value, while at the same time keeping ABI consistency. Fixes: 48a399119619